Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [imp-dev] IParseController.parse() parameter 'scanOnly'

Hi

Certainly seems sensible; I couldn't figure out how to code
an implementation that used the parameter given that the
callers did not appear coherent and given that
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=257627
identifies that parser synchronisation is currently badly broken.

Maybe once designed the new interface may use an IParseSynchronizer??

	Regards

		Ed Willink

> -----Original Message-----
> From: imp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:imp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert M. Fuhrer
> Sent: 12 March 2009 14:52
> To: IMP Developers List
> Cc: Jurgen Vinju; Philippe G. Charles
> Subject: [imp-dev] IParseController.parse() parameter 'scanOnly'
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I'd like to remove this formal parameter from the interface. Its  
> original intent
> was to permit a quick re-scan of the source without a full 
> parse, but  
> the
> problem of scheduling analyses for responsiveness is much deeper than
> this one flag addresses (and arguably incremental 
> scanning/parsing is a
> superior solution). Oh, and no one is actually using it (that I'm  
> aware of). :-)
> 
> Any objections?
> 
> --
> Cheers,
>    - Bob
> -------------------------------------------------
> Robert M. Fuhrer
> Research Staff Member
> Programming Technologies Dept.
> IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
> 
> IMP Project Lead (http://www.eclipse.org/imp)
> X10: Productivity for High-Performance Parallel Programming 
> (http://x10.sf.net 
> )
> 
> _______________________________________________
> imp-dev mailing list
> imp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev
> 




Back to the top