Re: [imp-dev] Proposal to place pdb.* in separate imp.analysis feature

[Stan Sutton <suttons@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi All,

I agree that it shouldn't be bundled
into a feature with more "necessary" components, so this would
be a good thing.

I suppose that if we get to a point
where people want to use the pdb without other analysis components then
we could separate them at that time :-)

I think we should move ahead with this.

Thanks!

Stan

Stan Sutton, Ph. D.
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
19 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532 USA
telephone:  1-914-784-7316, FAX:  1-914-784-7455, T/L 863
e-mail:  suttons@xxxxxxxxxx, Stan Sutton/Watson/IBM@IBMUS

Jurgen Vinju <Jurgen.Vinju@xxxxxx>
Sent by: imp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

02/03/2009 05:59 AM

Please respond to
IMP Developers List <imp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	IMP Developers List <imp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [imp-dev] Proposal to place pdb.* in separate imp.analysis         feature

Hi Bob,

That's a good plan. Thanks!

Jurgen

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Robert M. Fuhrer
<rfuhrer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Jurgen,
>
> Any objections to placing the pdb.* plugins in a separate imp.analysis
> feature?
>
> There are probably a number of users that aren't using the analysis
code (at
> least not yet), and thus may not want to distribute it with their
IMP-based
> IDE.
>
> It would still be hosted on the same update site, of course.
>
> This decision is probably one of the last decisions we need to make
before
> building our long-awaited new release.
>
> Cheers,
>  - Bob
>
> _______________________________________________
> imp-dev mailing list
> imp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev
>
_______________________________________________
imp-dev mailing list
imp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/imp-dev