Re: [ide4edu-dev] Checkpoint call

[Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I think it's worth pursing to see if there's value in the approach.

During the call today, I explicitly stated what I had only alluded to 
previously: my listing my priorities, I've basically told you what bugs 
I'm going to pay the most attention to.

I think the RCP angle is worth looking into, and I will help out as much 
as I can, but my priorities are with build, and removing API exposures. 
I will focus more of my attention there.

Wayne

Cory Matheson wrote:
> Guess my mic wasn't working or something...
>
> Anyways, I didn't quite get a chance to ask my question on the conf 
> call - but should I continue looking into an RCP app? I know that RCP 
> = eclipse, but my idea was to work with the classes such as 
> Application, ApplicationActionBarAdvisor, etc. etc. that are not 
> already present in our javalite.ui plugin, but are created when you 
> explicitly request an RCP application on creating a new plugin project.
>
> What are your thoughts on this?
>
> Thanks,
> Cory.
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>     Scheduled for 2pm EST on Friday.
>
>     #  Canada: 1-877-727-8553
>     # U.S.: 1-866-394-4146
>
>     Participant pass code = 518 427 095#
>
>     Wayne
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ide4edu-dev mailing list
> ide4edu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ide4edu-dev
>   

--
Wayne Beaton, The Eclipse Foundation
http://www.eclipse.org

I'm going to EclipseCon!
http://www.eclipsecon.org