Re: [ide-dev] Java IDEs comparison

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [ide-dev] Java IDEs comparison

From: Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:59:12 +0200
Delivered-to: ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ide-dev>
List-help: <mailto:ide-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ide-dev>, <mailto:ide-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/ide-dev>, <mailto:ide-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1

On 09/14/2016 12:31 AM, Patrik Suzzi wrote:

However, I think we should have a common strategy to fight messages
like this, as this can scare potential users.
The risk is to have an inverse network effect hitting our Favorite IDE.

How do current download and community metrics regarding Eclipse IDE look like? If they're good enough, they could be the best possible answer.

--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat
My blog - My Tweets

References:
- [ide-dev] Java IDEs comparison
  - From: Mickael Istria
- Re: [ide-dev] Java IDEs comparison
  - From: Michael Scharf
- Re: [ide-dev] Java IDEs comparison
  - From: Michael Scharf
- Re: [ide-dev] Java IDEs comparison
  - From: Daniel Megert
- Re: [ide-dev] Java IDEs comparison
  - From: Antoine THOMAS
- Re: [ide-dev] Java IDEs comparison
  - From: Mickael Istria
- Re: [ide-dev] Java IDEs comparison
  - From: Antoine THOMAS
- Re: [ide-dev] Java IDEs comparison
  - From: Patrik Suzzi

Prev by Date: Re: [ide-dev] VS Code
Next by Date: Re: [ide-dev] VS Code
Previous by thread: Re: [ide-dev] Java IDEs comparison
Next by thread: Re: [ide-dev] Java IDEs comparison
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs