Re: [ide-dev] Inconsistent Eclipse user experience

[Eric Moffatt <emoffatt@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Miles, I think you've pretty well nailed the base issue; our UI is an aggregation of many different bundles, each with their own extensions but with no finer-grained control over what is 'important' to a particular role. I'm very glad that 'bloat control' has finally reached the level where the community is *actively* looking for a mechanism to get a handle on this...

We've actually implemented a number of approaches to mitigate this over the years:

Perspectives: Tries to 'bundle' the views appropriate to a work flow within that perspective. The problem here is that it's not enforced (i.e. you see *all* views in the ShowView dialog), can't prevent other bundles from 'polluting' a given perspective with their own views (including adding them to the 'shortcuts', making them 'first class' citizens of the perspective. This also lead to the 'progressive discovery' approach..."Would you like to open the Debug Perspective ?" which is OK but represents a single hard-coded path to a particular perspective.

ActionSets: An attempt to limit the number of visible command elements (mostly menu items / TB's) by 'chunking' them into groups to which common visibility behaviors are applied. Aside from being the bane of our existence these also suffer from the lack of fine grained support.

Activities: Another attempt to limit the visibility of various UI elements...apparently not used much due to complexities in defining the 'Activity' definition.

There's also been some work on a lower level approach, removing extensions 'on the fly'; see 'https://wiki.eclipse.org/Product_Customization' and 'https://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox_Transforms'. Aside from the issues of having to hand-craft the XSLT I think that this is near to the correct approach (i.e. removing the complexity in the UI *before* the application starts). Again this also suffers from being less than flexible after defined (how do I as a user get something back if it's been 'filtered' ?).

Finally, of course, there are the EPP packages...

In short....even with all these abilities in place we're still where we're at...perhaps a new approach is needed ?

I'll outline some ideas for a possible approach in a separate email...;-),
Eric


Miles Parker ---03/10/2014 02:00:40 PM---Right. This is what I think of as the “right-click” problem. Supposedly the Eclipse context menu is

From:	Miles Parker <miles.parker@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:	Discussions about the IDE <ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:	03/10/2014 02:00 PM
Subject:	Re: [ide-dev] Inconsistent Eclipse user experience
Sent by:	ide-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Right. This is what I think of as the “right-click” problem. Supposedly the Eclipse context menu is “contextualized”, but that when you right click on an editor and there are 37 items on the menu, it’s clear the context isn’t refined enough! When “Paste” is the 15th item on that list, it’s evidence for even the most casual user noone is in a position to force a disciplined high-level design for the overall product. That’s why efforts like EasyEclipse are important. You need someone who cares about the typical end user — (and who makes money -- maybe not 1% money, but *some* money -- by caring) — to be able to make the hard choices about what get’s in by default and what doesn’t. But even with that effort, without providing tools to support deeper contextualization, we lose the advantage as soon as people start using plugin-ins, which is after all one of the strongest features of the Eclipse ecosystem.

The basic dilemma of Ux design is the same design conundrum as with all technologies from babylon on — how to give maximum information and control with minimum effort and cognitive load? One answer is to contextualize (the most extreme example being the original iPod scroll wheel).  Mylyn has gone a long way toward addressing the issue of content-based contextualization, but the community hasn't effectively addressed the issue of role or activity-based contextualization. The closest thing we have for that in Eclipse-land is Perspectives and that’s far too coarse grained and cognitively disruptive. But the great thing about Eclipse is that all of the underlying technologies to make a truly contextualized experience are all there. It’s “just” a matter of developing some approaches (and metaphors?) that support transparent, fluid and user-guided role contextualization and filtering UI and execution elements based on that.


On Mar 9, 2014, at 8:58 PM, Andrew Eisenberg <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I wouldn't be surprised if uninstalling Groovy-Eclipse could address some of his problems, but the post shows a larger problem with the IDE work we are (or at least I am) doing.  Too often features are implemented so that a handful of vocal users are happy, but the silent 99% don't have their needs fully met.
> 
> As a simple example, consider this statement: "Sometimes, selecting a launch configuration with arrow keys and hitting enter twice to run it works. Sometimes, it runs a previous launch configuration. Using the mouse is fully reliable but less efficient." I'm pretty sure it's because sometimes he has the editor active and the expected thing runs, but sometimes some other view is active. This makes sense to power users and the behavior is consistent with the rest of Eclipse, but it is probably non-intuitive for new users.
> 
> The problem is that determining and implementing the most intuitive workflow for new users that doesn't annoy power users is not a cheap or easy process. It involves something like user studies and active engagement with all of the community (not just the 1% (no, not *that* 1%)).  I admit that this is something that I have failed to do enough of.
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think it's worth noticing he mentions groovy eclipse which to make it work "hot patches" the JDT.
> 
> Pretty sure he should try uninstall groovy eclipse and see if that doesn't improve his eclipse experience.
> 
> This shows how great it would be if jdt could be better at allowing other javavm based languages to integrate better so tricks like hot patching aren't needed.
> 
> /max (sent from my phone)
> 
> 
> > On 09/03/2014, at 06.02, Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Interesting post. I'd love if we could find some way to enforce consistency in the IDE. There's lots of things we can override. I wonder if it's enough. Food for thought.
> >
> > I love the comparison with netbeans and intellij. Eclipse has so much to offer. We just need to find a way to manage the product as a whole to make it great.
> >
> > Thanks for this Stephan.
> >
> > Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
> >  Original Message
> > From: Stephan Herrmann
> > Sent: Saturday, March 8, 2014 8:35 PM
> > To: ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Reply To: Discussions about the IDE
> > Subject: Re: [ide-dev] Inconsistent Eclipse user experience
> >
> >
> > Have you guys seen this:
> >
> >   http://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/mv/msg/668948/1267143/#msg_1267143
> >
> > Sounds like another client for this group :)
> >
> > best,
> > Stephan
> > _______________________________________________
> > ide-dev mailing list
> > ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ide-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > ide-dev mailing list
> > ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ide-dev
> _______________________________________________
> ide-dev mailing list
> ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ide-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ide-dev mailing list
> ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ide-dev

_______________________________________________
ide-dev mailing list
ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ide-dev