Re: [ide-dev] IDE working group [WAS: Improving Eclipse JDT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [ide-dev] IDE working group [WAS: Improving Eclipse JDT - Ecosystem]

From: Wim Jongman <wim.jongman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:19:55 +0200
Delivered-to: ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ide-dev>
List-help: <mailto:ide-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ide-dev>, <mailto:ide-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/ide-dev>, <mailto:ide-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

while great on paper, isn't always a path to success. A little benevolent
dictatorship, or at least consensus building, goes a long way :).

What else but dictatorship is meritocracy? What else but dictatorship is moneyocracy? Is not fair that the appointed committers (or their sugar daddies) decide what is good for the commons?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ide-dev] IDE working group [WAS: Improving Eclipse JDT - Ecosystem]
  - From: Marcel Bruch

References:
- Re: [ide-dev] IDE working group [WAS: Improving Eclipse JDT - Ecosystem]
  - From: Gunnar Wagenknecht
- Re: [ide-dev] IDE working group [WAS: Improving Eclipse JDT - Ecosystem]
  - From: Doug Schaefer

Prev by Date: Re: [ide-dev] IDE working group [WAS: Improving Eclipse JDT - Ecosystem]
Next by Date: Re: [ide-dev] IDE working group [WAS: Improving Eclipse JDT - Ecosystem]
Previous by thread: Re: [ide-dev] IDE working group [WAS: Improving Eclipse JDT - Ecosystem]
Next by thread: Re: [ide-dev] IDE working group [WAS: Improving Eclipse JDT - Ecosystem]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs