[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [iam-dev] Target platform, the Embedder and IP
|
Good work Abel.
Tracking down all of the legal requirements was likely very time consuming.
- Joakim
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Abel Muiño Vizcaino <amuino@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Current target definition includes bundles needed by the embedder, and the
> embedder's source is expected to be in the workspace.
>
> This might be not "clean", since the embedder is not an eclipse project.
>
> My proposal would be to have IAM and the embedder completely separated (at
> least while the IP review for the embedder is not done... eclipse legal
> suggested not processing it for IP review in its current state... maybe
> after an alfa/beta release).
>
> Embedder releases would be generated on q4e/googlecode and the generated
> bundles will be installed in the IAM target platform.
>
> On top of that, we will need to request the PMC and EMO accept our
> dependency on the embedder (even if it is not hosted at eclipse). It should
> be a "pre-req" dependency per:
> http://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/Eclipse_Policy_and_Procedure_for_3rd_Party_Dependencies_Final.pdf
> I'll take care of that.
>
> Finally, for your reference, here is the list of IP links that I've
> collected so far :-)
> IP Poster:
> http://www.eclipse.org/legal/EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf
>
> Committer Guidelines
> http://www.eclipse.org/legal/committerguidelines.php
>
> The three Laws of Eclipse
> http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/three-laws-of-eclipse.php
>
> Third Party:
> http://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/Eclipse_Policy_and_Procedure_for_3rd_Party_Dependencies_Final.pdf
>
> Yours,
> Abel Muiño_______________________________________________
> iam-dev mailing list
> iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev
>
