[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[hyades-dev] Hyades Committer call - 30 August 2004 -MINUTES

Attendees: Antony, Bob, Eugene, Harm, Joe, Kent, Nellie, Rob

Hyades 3.0.1
- Drop to IES planned for this week, containing critical fixes approved by Atlantic CCB & IES

Hyades 3.1
- Many open defects targeted for iteration 2; can these all be contained?
- Joe - plans to re-target some
- Eugene - plans to re-target some
- Bob - not many defects assigned (relatively), but trying to scrub list; several resources out this week
- Kent - no i2 defects
- All to review list of committed line items on eclipse.org
- Kent - spec may be re-targeted

Misc
- Harm requests all Committers to provide list of component committers to him, to be provided to Eclipse board (re-validation of committers)
- Next Monday is a North American holiday, so this meeting will be rescheduled to Tuesday (Sept 7) at 10:00AM EDT (30 mins earlier than usual, to avoid overlap with PMC)

Defects reviewed

72180 - Bob: re-targeting; readme being applied for 3.0.1 drop; India still investigating
72307 - Joe: approved; fix in-hand & tested (in Friday's 3.0.1 build); Kent/Dave H. received approval for this fix for RPT on IES call today
72475 - Joe: approved; fix in-hand & tested (in Friday's 3.0.1 build); Kent/Dave H. received approval for this fix for RPT on IES call today
72558 - Joe: approved; fix in-hand & tested (in Friday's 3.0.1 build); Kent/Dave H. received approval for this fix for RPT on IES call today
72518 - Bob: Target for 3.1? bug only against new agents? Unable to reproduce against 3.0.1 yet; Bob following-up w/Samson asap
72519 - Bob: Target for 3.1? bug only against new agents? Unable to reproduce against 3.0.1 yet; Bob following-up w/Samson asap
72456 - Kent: approved; fix in-hand & tested; regression bug
72557 - Eugene: approved; fix in-hand & tested; approved by IES 8/27; bug fix for AC large logs
56182 - Bob: readme to be applied to 3.0.1; re-target this to 3.1i2; Rob to follow-up - is anyone really 'needing' this JVM fix? (appears not)
63969 - Bob: readme to be applied to 3.0.1; re-target this to 3.1i2; Rob to follow-up - is anyone really 'needing' this JVM fix? (appears not)
65193 - Bob: readme to be applied to 3.0.1; re-target this to 3.1i2; Rob to follow-up - is anyone really 'needing' this JVM fix? (appears not)
72218 - Bob: fix in code base; originator now says this is not needed; fix to be backed out & re-targeted to 3.1i2
70801 - Joe: RFT wants in 3.0.2 if that release happens; does not need in 3.0.1; leave as-is
72820 - Bob: bug against 3.1; Bob to verify it does not impact 3.0.1, update Harm off-line
72143 - Bob: follow-up w/Allan re: sev & target
72601 - Bob: target for 3.0.1; increase sev
72603 - Bob: target for 3.0.1; increase sev
72107 - Bob: re-target to 3.1i2
66239 - Bob: triage & probably re-target to 3.1i2
68115 - Bob: triage & probably re-target to 3.1i2
68278 - Joe: re-targeted to 3.1i2

* END *