[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
[hyades-dev] Meeting minutes for 4/28 Hyades Execution Histories Model Subgroup Team Meeting
|
Attached are the meeting minutes from
the first team meeting of the Execution Histories Subgroup.
Regards,
ashish
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ashish K. Mathur
IBM - SWG - Rational Division
Phone: (919)845-3213 Fax: (919)845-3250
Email: akmathur@xxxxxxxxxxExecution Histores Model Subgroup, 28-Apr-2003
Attending
---------
Joe Toomey - IBM Rational Lexington
Antony Miguel - Scapa
Gian Franco Bonini - SAP
Marcelo Paternostro - IBM Toronto
Stefan Daume - Scapa
Kent Siefkes - IBM Rational Raleigh
Ashish Mathur - IBM Rational Raleigh
Recorded Discussion
-------------------
- Ashish Mathur will be the subgroup leader.
- Agreed on the need for an API to log a test case verdict, which does
not assume a modeled behavior.
- Must be near finalization of execution history model within 2 weeks
to allow UI team to build UI.
Minimal Use cases to address for Hyades 1.0.0:
---------------------------------------------
1) Must be able to add name and description to execution history
before or after test run.
2) A Running test must be able to log all events defined by execution
events subgroup.
3) Must be able to view the execution history log after the test run.
4) Must be able to view execution histores in hierarchical folders
(resource navigator)
5) Must be able to navigate from TestSuites to Execution Histories
of that suite
6) Take requirements from UI Reporting group (to ensure that the data
needed for reports is captured.)
7) Need to allow navigation from Execution History to Execution
Traces (if it exists)
8) Need to allow gesture to "promote" verdict(s) from execution
history to Test Model persisted verdict(s)
* U2TP portion of Test Model will be realized in Execution History
model via API calls for start and stop of test case and test
suite. Require at least a test suite start, test case start
end, test suite end
* For logging behavior, allow looging with IDs (that map to
modeled behavior), also allow use of specific log apis to indicate
test case behvaior structure (log(LOOP_START)). Both are optional.
Questions
* Can we create a test agent? (who would write it?) Other
alternatives are to use the Logging agent?
* Who's writing the loader?
* Who's writing the APIs?
* Who's defining the XML fragments?
* Who's writing the UI?
* Who's writing the agent (if we need one)?
Actions
-------
Ashish - Determine weekly meeting time, schedule meeting, send invitation.