[higgins-dev] IMI + OpenID

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[higgins-dev] IMI + OpenID

From: Markus Sabadello <msabadello@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 02:25:09 +0200
Delivered-to: higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; b=QIvV1h0Cxje9rl+4hpc89TsvLqvzgokf1N86h7ZElyl0eK2UztVgtxHICs3UMDEB+7 VnKaMTJrBuiFg7AyhrNzIWHk+geMetZsZPa+TS2nv8jGLLBGA+H2SOPhotUf6Hx5wvtX vsuavBK5obVmkFK0YbKhbe9XZrfIPYzMoc55U=
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/higgins-dev>
List-help: <mailto:higgins-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev>, <mailto:higgins-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev>, <mailto:higgins-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I tried capturing some thoughts that came up on the last Higgins call, regarding building better IMI support into the OpenID-based "Higgins Web Selector":
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Web_Selector_1.1#Requesting_an_i-card

It lists a few possible methods for "doing i-cards" over OpenID:

Method 1: AX attribute identifiers are claim URIs
Method 2a: Well-known AX attribute identifiers are mapped to claim URIs
Method 2b: Well-known SREG attribute identifiers are mapped to claim URIs
Method 3: Advanced IMI compatibility

Markus

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [higgins-dev] IMI + OpenID
  - From: John Bradley

Prev by Date: [higgins-dev] Changes to Authentication Materials
Next by Date: Re: [higgins-dev] IMI + OpenID
Previous by thread: [higgins-dev] Changes to Authentication Materials
Next by thread: Re: [higgins-dev] IMI + OpenID
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs