Re: [higgins-dev] Intent of Policy in Higgins 1.1

[David Kuehr-McLaren <dkuehrmc@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Paul, 

Thanks.  

You have probably already corrected
this one, as well, in 1.1.106 the label for "partof" is "part".
 

David 

PS.  I should ask you if you want
these types of comments? 

David Kuehr-McLaren 
Tivoli Security
919.224.1960

Paul Trevithick <ptrevithick@xxxxxxxxx>

04/16/2009 05:46 PM

To	David Kuehr-McLaren/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc	higgins-dev <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject	Re: [higgins-dev] Intent of Policy in Higgins 1.1

David,

That was a bug. I’ve fixed it in (upcoming) 1.1.107. The RDF Label now
reads “Policy”. The Policy class is the superclass of the “AccessControl”
class. 

--Paul


On 4/16/09 9:46 AM, "David Kuehr-McLaren" <dkuehrmc@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


Paul, 

The RDF Label on the Policy object in the HOWL1-1-106.rdf file says the
Policy object is an Access Control Policy.  Is that true (there is
a subclass for access control), or is the Policy object a base object that
can apply as the parent class to other policy types? 

Thanks, 

David 

David Kuehr-McLaren 
Tivoli Security
919.224.1960