Re: [higgins-dev] Java 5, going once...

[Paula K Austel <pka@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Paula Austel votes -1


----------------------------------------------------------
Paula K. Austel
Web Services Security
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
(914)784-5025
Tieline 863-5025

From:	Paul Trevithick <ptrevithick@xxxxxxxxx>
To:	higgins-dev <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:	Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	12/03/2008 02:14 PM
Subject:	Re: [higgins-dev] Java 5, going once...

---

Tony, can you please get each IBM
committer to vote independently? I’m pretty sure that’s the only way
these committer votes can be done. Cc-ing Bjorn in case I’m wrong. 

--Paul


On 12/2/08 8:31 PM, "Anthony Nadalin" <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

All IBM commiters vote is for option
-1

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122

"Tom
Doman" ---12/02/2008 06:24:53 PM---+2

From:

"Tom Doman" <tdoman@xxxxxxxxxx>

To:

"higgins-dev" <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

12/02/2008 06:24 PM

Subject:

Re: [higgins-dev] Java 5, going once...

---

+2 
 
>>> Paul Trevithick <ptrevithick@xxxxxxxxx>
12/02/08 4:44 PM >>> 
I think we*ve had sufficient time to air the issues for and against. I
would
ask all Higgins committers to vote by Monday (Dec 8th) as follows:

- 1 = no change (the entire project stays on Java 1.4)
 0 = abstain
+1 = selected components of Higgins 1.1 may use Java 5
+2 = the entire Higgins 1.1 project moves to Java 5.0

For the +1 case, the relevant component owner will make the decision.

My vote is +2

-- Paul

http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/team-
leaders.php


_______________________________________________
higgins- dev mailing list
higgins- dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-
dev

_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev

_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev