Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [higgins-dev] Java 5, going once...

Don't agree that life is simpler, please give examples of why this should be changed

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122

Inactive hide details for "Markus Sabadello" ---11/28/2008 08:06:10 PM---I think both developers and users of Higgins would agr"Markus Sabadello" ---11/28/2008 08:06:10 PM---I think both developers and users of Higgins would agree that 1.5


From:

"Markus Sabadello" <msabadello@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

To:

"Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions" <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

11/28/2008 08:06 PM

Subject:

Re: [higgins-dev] Java 5, going once...




I think both developers and users of Higgins would agree that 1.5
makes life a lot simpler.

As a developer, I can write my code faster and make it much more
readable and less error-prone.

As a user, it's much more convenient to get e.g. a List<IEntity> than
just a List.

Markus

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Since the current build is on 1.4 so what is the rational to change ? I'm
> not seeing the motivation to change or do we just change things ?
>
> Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
>
> Paul Trevithick ---11/26/2008 08:46:29 AM---I've been waiting to see if
> anyone will step forward and argue for why they require 1.4.X support for
> Higgins 1.1 (specificall
>
>
> From:
> Paul Trevithick <ptrevithick@xxxxxxxxx>
> To:
> higgins-dev <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:
> 11/26/2008 08:46 AM
> Subject:
> [higgins-dev] Java 5, going once...
> ________________________________
>
>
> I've been waiting to see if anyone will step forward and argue for why they
> require 1.4.X support for Higgins 1.1 (specifically). As we discussed in the
> F2F if someone requires 1.4.X they at least have the option of using Higgins
> 1.0. Not a great option because so much is progressing in 1.1, but it's
> something. Historically Tony of IBM has put forward IBM's requirement for
> 1.4.X, but they have been silent on the issue of late.
>
> Unless we hear soon from IBM or others on this point, we'll take one last
> poll, and then move to Java 5 for Higgins 1.1.
>
> -Paul _______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev

GIF image

GIF image


Back to the top