RE: [higgins-dev] F.Y.I Higgins SVN repository move -statusupdate

[Michael McIntosh <mikemci@xxxxxxxxxx>]

It sounds like - if this tape is in fact bad - we can just overwrite the
older version with our latest local version once the server is writeable
again?
We just won't be able to deal with merging very well (so everyone please
stay out of the sts projects please ;-) )

higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 08/13/2008 08:59:18 AM:

> [image removed]
>
> RE: [higgins-dev] F.Y.I Higgins SVN repository move -statusupdate
>
> Mary Ruddy
>
> to:
>
> 'Higgins \(Trust Framework\) Project developer discussions'
>
> 08/13/2008 09:01 AM
>
> Sent by:
>
> higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Please respond to "Higgins \(Trust Framework\) Project developer
discussions"
>
> Update from the webmaster as of early morning
>
> "Well I talked to our ISP around midnight and they informed me that
> they were having issues loading one of the tapes in the data set.
> Just so you know bug 243737 is being used by a couple of other
> projects to track this issue."
>
> -Mary
>
> From: Mary Ruddy [mailto:mary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 4:53 PM
> To: 'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions'
> Subject: RE: [higgins-dev] F.Y.I Higgins SVN repository move
-statusupdate

> Ping'd Matt again....
> From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> ] On Behalf Of Jim Sermersheim
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 3:18 PM
> To: 'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions'
> Subject: Re: [higgins-dev] F.Y.I Higgins SVN repository move
-statusupdate

> +1.  I've got changes to put.
>
> >>> "Duane Buss" <dbuss@xxxxxxxxxx> 08/12/08 11:18 AM >>>
> Is there an anticipated time we will be up and working again?
>

> Duane
>
> >>>
>
> From:
>
> "Mary Ruddy" <mary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> To:
>
> "'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions'"
> <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Date:
>
> 08/11/08 2:45 PM
>
> Subject:
>
> [higgins-dev] F.Y.I Higgins SVN repository move - status update
>
> The Eclipse webmaster has
> flagged the repo as read only while
> he
> investigate
> s.
>
> From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> ] On Behalf Of Andrew Hodgkinson
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 4:09 PM
> To: 'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions'
> Subject: Re: [higgins-dev] F.Y.I Higgins SVN repository move

>
> The restore doesn't seem to be complete.  The latest Higgins
> repository revision being reported is 20093.  On Friday (when I
> lasted checked something into Higgins), the revision was 20333.
> That means we have lost about one week of commits.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy
>
> >>> "Mary Ruddy" <mary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 08/11/08 1:56 PM >>>
> Higgins is one of several Eclipse projects that have SVN
> repositories grouped together under the Technology top level
> project.
>
> "
> E
> clipse has
> re-evaluated its subversion repository layout, and has concluded the
> current 'everything under one umbrella' approach is not scalable as
> projects continue to move and grow. As such we are moving to a 'one
> project, one repository' setup which should improve both our ability
> to scale and ease transitions from one project to another. So what
> does all of this mean to you? Well it means that we need to make
> changes to the Technology repository to break you all into
> individual repositories instead of one large one. As far as your
> committers are concerned these changes should be invisible, your
> code will not change anything other than it's physical location on
> the dev.eclipse.org file system
> . "
>
> Eclipse tried to do this this weekend, and ran in to issues.  A res
> tore has completed, and everything seems to be functioning
> correctly. Please let me know if you experience any issues.  Eclipse
> is going to try to do this again the weekend of August 16-17.
>
> _______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev