[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [higgins-dev] Isolating NLS.javafunctionalityfromorg.eclipse.osgi_3.3.2.R33x_v20080105.jar
|
Thanks Chris,
Higgins has use cases that are much broader than the
typical Eclipse environment,where we need to be light weight, and so we can't be
OSGi-based.
The Equinox supplement bundle is a find way to achieve what you
want as it was designed to use on other OSGi frameworks and strip out any
Eclipse specific dependencies. As an outsider, my only worry is that if you
don't have 'org.eclipse.osgi' anywhere in your stack and you're using Java, you
aren't OSGi-based. Is the problem that org.eclipse.osgi is too large for the
environment you need to run on?
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 7:18 AM, Mary Ruddy <
mary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Does it
contain things that we don't need? If so, we should still look into
using a subset.. I will ping Equinox team.
Hi, I found another jar file which contains
the org.eclipse.osgi.util.NLS.class file and its footprint is smaller than
org.eclipse.osgi_3.3.2.R33x_v20080105.jar (928,754 bytes).
org.eclipse.equinox.supplement_1.1.0.v20080421-2006.jar: 92,869
bytes (http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/equinox/drops/R-3.4-200806172000/download.php?dropFile=org.eclipse.equinox.supplement_1.1.0.v20080421-2006.jar) Is this
small enough to be included in dependencies?
Thanks and regards,
Ranjan. |
|
|
Ranjan Kumar Tivoli
Security Software Development (919)224-2037 (T/L: 687-2037) rk@xxxxxxxxxx
|
|
|
Dedication to every client's
success. |
IBMers Value |
|
Innovation that matters - for our
company and for the world. |
|
|
Trust and personal responsibility
in all relationships. |
|
Lord, Grant me
the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change
the things I can, and the wisdom to know the
difference. |
_______________________________________________
higgins-dev
mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
--
Cheers,
~ Chris Aniszczyk