Re: [higgins-dev] Original vs. Revised Access Control Policy Proposals

[Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Must be Notes that is doing this

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122

Paul Trevithick ---07/01/2008 11:32:40 AM---Drat. I checked with 3 people and it worked for all 3, but clearly not you. So I’ll create a wiki page.

From:	Paul Trevithick <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:	higgins-dev <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	07/01/2008 11:32 AM
Subject:	Re: [higgins-dev] Original vs. Revised Access Control Policy Proposals

---

Drat. I checked with 3 people and it worked for all 3, but clearly not you. So I’ll create a wiki page.


On 7/1/08 12:00 AM, "Anthony Nadalin" <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

pics/whatever did not come through

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122

Paul Trevithick ---06/30/2008 08:45:39 PM---Jim,


From:
Paul Trevithick <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

To:
Jim Sermersheim <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx>

Cc:
higgins-dev <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:
06/30/2008 08:45 PM

Subject:
[higgins-dev] Original vs. Revised Access Control Policy Proposals


---




Jim,

Since I wasn’t very clear in my previous email, I’ve created two slides that compare the old and the revised access control PolicyEntity proposals. First, the original proposal:


And here is the revised proposal:


-Paul_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev

_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev