[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [higgins-dev] IdAS API extensibility
|
Jim,
Actually, I think you're right. You'll probably have to implement your best guess and let those who require it, drive changes. Right now, Phil has the best use case, correct? I'd say, start there and go for it!
Tom
>>> "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> 12/04/07 8:26 PM >>>
If history is an indicator of how to get input on a topic like this, I should implement this in an obviously wrong way and then wait until someone tries to code to it.
Anyone have any input?
>>> "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> 11/30/07 6:48 PM >>>
I need to know how to best address https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=196390 ( https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=196390 )
I put out a wiki page at http://wiki.eclipse.org/IdAS_API_Extensibility. This describes some of the proposed ways of making APIs extensible.
If you're a context provider writer, or a consumer of IdAS (or just interested at all), could you please look at this wiki and give feedback. Feel free to add more proposals, or pros or cons to the page, or talk about them here. I tend to favor #4 ( http://wiki.eclipse.org/IdAS_API_Extensibility#extendedOperation_method ) and #1 ( http://wiki.eclipse.org/IdAS_API_Extensibility#Add_just_one_more_argument ) right now.
