| Re: [higgins-dev] IdASRegistry without XRDS |
|
Currently, the instance handler looks for configuration info inside the
ComponentSettings setting. Assuming we want to keep that behavior (or
else a lot of Mike's stuff will break), then I would propose to not
move the configuration info for the factory instances inside the
IdentityAttributeService setting. A nice thing about using the (de facto) standard instance and singleton settings is that removes any dependency from the config.xml project to idas. Before, we had a special handler for IdentityAttributeService, which created a dependency -- I was not quite happy with that. Now that it's gone, I'd prefer to not reintroduce the dependency. ...Greg Jim Sermersheim wrote: Markus, After you left the conversation, we wondered if we could move the factory instances (and their config of course) inside the IdentityAttributeService setting."Markus Sabadello" <msabadello@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 10/02/07 5:01 PM >>>All, Mike, Daniel, Greg and Jim really helped me today in IRC #higgins to understand how the IdASRegistry needs to change. Here's a short summary: http://wiki.eclipse.org/ContextDiscoveryComponents_withoutXRDS Please check this and let me know if anything about the described behavior and/or example needs to change. A few more things may need to be adjusted, but I think finally got the idea of what it means to "configure the IdASRegistry using the Configuration API". Thanks again for taking the time today. Markus _______________________________________________ higgins-dev mailing list higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev |