[higgins-dev] Re: Fwd: XRI/XRDS and new IdASRegistry

["Markus Sabadello" <msabadello@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mike,

Any chance you have time today? I'll be available in #higgins for the next two hours in case you can spare a few minutes.

If not, maybe you and my colleague Jeesmon Jacob can get together. He will be in Austin and he's also interested in the IdASRegistry.

Markus

On 10/1/07, Markus Sabadello <msabadello@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Mike,

I am flexible today. 3pm (or later) is fine with me.

Markus

On 10/1/07, Michael McIntosh < mikemci@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Markus,

I will not be available until after 3pm ET.

Regards,
Mike

markus.sabadello@xxxxxxxxx wrote on 09/29/2007 11:26:35 AM:

> Hi Mike,
>
> Unfortunately I won't be able to make it to the F2F. Let's talk on
> IRC #higgins on Monday. How would 1pm eastern time work for you?
>
> Markus

> On 9/27/07, Michael McIntosh < mikemci@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Will you be at the Higgins F2F in Austin?
>
> Otherwise Friday or Monday via IRC will work for me.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> markus.sabadello@xxxxxxxxx wrote on 09/27/2007 08:26:50 AM:
>
> > Hello Mike,
> >
> > I am sending this again.. I would really like to try and understand
> > what changes need to be done to the IdASRegistry so that it can be
> > used for your purposes too.
> >
> > I have heard your concerns from different perspectives and don't
> > fully understand what needs to be done. I tried to summarize the
> > issue as best as I could in the mail below. I don't understand what
> > precisely is meant with "The IdASRegistry should be configured using
> > the Configuration API". I think we should talk directly.
> > Unfortunately I will not be able to be on the call today, but maybe
> > the two of us can have a call (or IRC chat) about it next week? Monday
> maybe?
> >
> > Markus
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Markus Sabadello < msabadello@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Sep 20, 2007 6:58 PM
> > Subject: XRI/XRDS and new IdASRegistry
> > To: "Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions" <
> > higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> > Okay I know not everyone is happy with the new IdASRegistry, and it
> > doesn't make a lot of sense that some of us are using the new one,
> > and some still the old one, right? So let's try to solve this..
> >
> > As far as I understand, one of the main concerns is that the
> > IdASRegistry configures itself from an XRDS file (contextfactories.
> > xrds). Let me point out that this is not really necessary, the
> > IdASRegistry also has methods for manually registering context
> > factories (in which case they already have to be configured).
> >
> > The IdASRegistry does NOT configure or register contexts itself. Is
> > this a problem?
> >
> > In order to create (instantiate) a context, one needs an IContextId
> > (which can be constructed from a local XRDS file, an XRI or a URL).
> > Is this a problem?
> >
> > What else is a problem?
> >
> > I'd really like to do everything I can to make this work for everyone.
> >
> > Markus
> >
> > (sorry, I dropped a few times from the call today)
> >

>
>