Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [higgins-dev] Proposal to rename SubjectRelationship and ContextRelationship in HOWL

I don't quite see the advantage of changing relationship to relation, but I don't have any real objections, either.

So is this "+0"?

...Greg


Paul Trevithick wrote:

After working with Drummond Reed on [1] I now see that a “Contextualized SubjectId” or “CSId” is synonymous with SubjectRelationship as defined here [2].

 

Rather than have two names for the same concept, I propose we replace them both with “SubjectRelation” (loosing the “ship” shortens things a tiny bit and lines up better with the higgins:relation property). For symmetry I also propose replacing ContextRelationship with ContextRelation while we’re at it.

 

-Paul

 

[1] http://wiki.eclipse.org/ContextId#ABNF

[2] http://wiki.eclipse.org/Subject_Relationship

 

 


_______________________________________________ higgins-dev mailing list higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev


Back to the top