[higgins-dev] Your latest thoughts on whether metadata can/should be com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[higgins-dev] Your latest thoughts on whether metadata can/should be complex or simple?

From: "Paul Trevithick" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:47:29 -0400
Delivered-to: higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev>
List-help: <mailto:higgins-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev>, <mailto:higgins-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev>, <mailto:higgins-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AcfNjDaReUc+ttLPT4u/veX0kOqSHA==

Hi Jim,

If memory serves, you have been considering once again allowing complex metadata, although this is not currently the case in the IdAS API. Is this still your inclination? I ask because currently we have a disconnect between IdAS API and HOWL semantics. HOWL is one design iterations behind and thus still allows complex metadata.

-Paul

Follow-Ups:
- [higgins-dev] Re: Your latest thoughts on whether metadata can/should be complex or simple?
  - From: Jim Sermersheim

Prev by Date: [higgins-dev] Non breaking change to HOWL (v1.17)
Next by Date: [higgins-dev] Proposal to rename SubjectRelationship and ContextRelationship in HOWL
Previous by thread: [higgins-dev] Non breaking change to HOWL (v1.17)
Next by thread: [higgins-dev] Re: Your latest thoughts on whether metadata can/should be complex or simple?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs