While I can’t speak for all the
Bandit Utilities, there are some for which we don’t have an equivalent
Higgins function today. That’s why they have been dual licensed under EPL
- to facilitate use by Higgins.
-----Original Message-----
From:
higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Nadalin
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 5:42 PM
To: Higgins (Trust Framework)
Project developer discussions
Cc: higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx;
higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [higgins-dev]
Contributing Bandit utilities to Higgins
What are these utilities for ? Do we already have equivalent function
in Higgins today ? Making a generic utilities package is hard as it tends to be
a catch all
Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
"Tom
Doman" ---07/16/2007 11:55:31 AM---Currently, all Bandit utilities used in
Novell contribute CPs are dual licensed under the EPL and LGPL. Having them in
a diffe
|
From:
|
"Tom
Doman" <TDoman@xxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
To:
|
<higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
Date:
|
07/16/2007 11:55 AM
|
|
Subject:
|
[higgins-dev]
Contributing Bandit utilities to Higgins
|
Currently,
all Bandit utilities used in Novell contribute CPs are dual licensed under the
EPL and LGPL. Having them in a different project from Higgins actually
makes it harder for us to debug, modify, and maintain them as we make changes
in Higgins. We've discussed moving them into the Higgins project so I'd
like to know if anyone within or outside Novell has any issues with just moving
these to Higgins. If not, where would we like them?
org.eclipse.higgins.util?
Thanks,
Tom
_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
