Re: [higgins-dev] RP code checked in

[Greg Byrd <gbyrd@xxxxxxxx>]

I thought Jeff meant that the MSFT projects were a bit light.

...Greg


Duane Buss wrote:

I hadn't encountered the term Relying Parity Service before, is that the improved version of a Relying Party Service?  (grin)  

 

I have read the pages and downloaded the projects and I agree with Jeffrey, they are currently 'a bit light.'   From the wiki I know where RSSE and the other RP components fit in but the actual internal architecture and functionality are vague.   Can we make this a focus on the mailing lists and conference calls to have open discussion about the direction, architecture, structure of these components?  

 

 

-Duane