Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [higgins-dev] Code Changes

My suggestions:
- the HEAD is where bug-fixing and other very low risk changes should be
committed.
- if any of us do create a branch and commit code to it, they'll be
responsible for remerging those changes to the HEAD stream after Catalyst
(June 27)

Tom wrote:
> 
> Shall we come up with a Higgins prescribed way to name Branches and
> Versions if we're going to do this?  I'm ready to branch the JNDI CP
> for some changes but I'm not sure how to name nor what our "go
> forward" strategy is as far as merging goes.  Will we always merge
> into HEAD eventually?  Or will we pick a branch named by our current
> milestone?  Something else?  We need something that makes sense
> and will make it easy for developers to participate.
> 
> I freely admit to being a CVS newbie in this regard.  I've never
> branched, versioned, or, of course, merged.  So, I'm looking for
> some seasoned guidance and sensical plan here.  Anyone?
> 
> Thanks,
> Tom
> 
> >>> Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx> 6/6/2007 2:12 PM >>>
> 
> So this is where I get worried as since .8 has some changes in HBX and
> RPPS
> that are not done this may break the demo, so I would like to make sure we
> freeze HBX and RPPS like real soon to avoid issues in this space. So any
> changes in HBX or RPPS we will fork and resolve after interop
> 
> Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
> 
> 
> 
>              "Paul Trevithick"
>              <paul@socialphysi
>              cs.org>                                                    To
>              Sent by:                  "'Higgins \(Trust Framework\)
>              higgins-dev-bounc         Project developer discussions'"
>              es@xxxxxxxxxxx            <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>                                                                         cc
> 
>              06/06/2007 12:37                                      Subject
>              PM                        RE: [higgins-dev] Code Changes
> 
> 
>              Please respond to
>              "Higgins \(Trust
>                 Framework\)
>              Project developer
>                discussions"
>              <higgins-dev@ecli
>                  pse.org>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> M0.8 is not done. At this point I propose we hold off on declaring victory
> on M0.8 until after the interop.
> 
> 
> From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Nadalin
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 12:50 PM
> To: Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions
> Cc: 'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions';
> higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [higgins-dev] Code Changes
> 
> 
> 
> yep that would be good, I also assume we are complete on milestone .8 and
> we can hold on that until after the interop
> 
> Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
> Inactive hide details for "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx>"Jim
> Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                          "Jim
>                          Sermershe
>                          im"
>                          <jimse@no
>                          vell.com>                                      To
> 
>                          Sent by:            "'Higgins (Trust Framework)
>                          higgins-d           Project developer
>                          ev-bounce           discussions'"
>                          s@eclipse           <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>                          .org
>                                                                         cc
> 
>                          06/06/200
>                          7 11:44                                   Subject
>                          AM
>                                              Re: [higgins-dev] Code
>                                              Changes
> 
> 
> 
>                            Please
>                           respond
>                              to
>                           "Higgins
>                           \(Trust
>                           Framewor
>                             k\)
>                           Project
>                           develope
>                              r
>                           discussi
>                             ons"
>                           <higgins
>                           -dev@ecl
>                           ipse.org
>                              >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> sounds good.
> 
> If/when we need to do a bug fix, I suppose we should notify the list just
> in case of unforseen ramifications?
> 
> >>> Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx> 6/6/07 10:33 AM >>>
> 
> 
> I would like to propose that all non-bug related changes be held or forked
> until after June 25, thus putting a freeze on current code before the
> Burton Interop, as we don't want to spend resources chasing bugs that
> changes might cause, and we would resume normal processes after June 25th
> 
> Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
> _______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
> _______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev



Back to the top