RE: [higgins-dev] Code Changes

[Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx>]

So this is where I get worried as since .8 has some changes in HBX and RPPS that are not done this may break the demo, so I would like to make sure we freeze HBX and RPPS like real soon to avoid issues in this space. So any changes in HBX or RPPS we will fork and resolve after interop

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
"Paul Trevithick" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Paul Trevithick" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

06/06/2007 12:37 PM

Please respond to
"Higgins \(Trust Framework\) Project developer discussions" <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"'Higgins \(Trust Framework\) Project developer discussions'" <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [higgins-dev] Code Changes

M0.8 is not done. At this point I propose we hold off on declaring victory on M0.8 until after the interop.

---

From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Nadalin
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 12:50 PM
To: Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions
Cc: 'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions'; higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [higgins-dev] Code Changes

yep that would be good, I also assume we are complete on milestone .8 and we can hold on that until after the interop

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
"Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx>

"Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

06/06/2007 11:44 AM

Please respond to
"Higgins \(Trust Framework\) Project developer discussions" <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions'" <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [higgins-dev] Code Changes

sounds good.

If/when we need to do a bug fix, I suppose we should notify the list just in case of unforseen ramifications?

>>> Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx> 6/6/07 10:33 AM >>>

I would like to propose that all non-bug related changes be held or forked until after June 25, thus putting a freeze on current code before the Burton Interop, as we don't want to spend resources chasing bugs that changes might cause, and we would resume normal processes after June 25th

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev