Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [higgins-dev] I-Cards

+1. Yes, these are also part of the plan. I’ve been thinking/assuming that they should be implemented by a new and separate “ZCard I-Card Provider” plugin. They are different enough in how they work from the CardSpace-defined managed i-cards that they are worthy of being a forth kind of i-card: (Personal, CardSpace-defined Managed, Higgins-defined URICard, Higgins-defined ZCard) and that these distinctions are worth exposing to the user.

 


From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Nadalin
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 2:44 PM
To: Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions
Cc: 'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions'; higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [higgins-dev] I-Cards

 

Well we already have zCards implemented which hold claims that are not within the scope of CardSpace and which enable the selection of multiple cards

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
Inactive hide details for "Paul Trevithick" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>"Paul Trevithick" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Paul Trevithick" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/29/2007 08:41 AM

Please respond to
"Higgins \(Trust Framework\) Project developer discussions" <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To


"'Higgins \(Trust Framework\) Project developer discussions'" <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

cc

Subject


RE: [higgins-dev] I-Cards

 


In the very short term, especially as we get ready for an interop event at the Catalyst show at the end of June we have an emphasis on CardSpace-compatible i-card implementation work. However, URI i-cards are definitely in the plan for 1.0, and considerable design work has already been completed on them. A URI i-card itself holds nothing but a ContextId + SubjectId that are resolveable by IdAS. As for the Deployments page (see [1]) these two i-card providers were missing from the summary table. I’ve added them now.

-Paul

[1] http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Deployments#Configuration_Summary


From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Sweeney
Sent:
Tuesday, May 29, 2007 8:34 AM
To:
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
[higgins-dev] I-Cards



I am trying to understand what I-Cards are under development.

At http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Components#I-Card_Registry_and_I-Card_Providers, as well as the MS CardSpace I-Cards, it lists:
URI Managed I-Card Provider
URI Personal I-Card Provider

But at the deployement page(http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Deployments) I can't see any reference to URI I-Cards.

Does that mean that at the moment MS CardSpace is the only I-Card solution? If not, please could you point me at where the other options are listed?

Thanks,
John

John Sweeney, IBM UK Technical Staff Member, MBCS CITP
Client IT Architect, Public Sector UK
Mobile:+44-(0)7802-940-574 (Int: 27-3933)
E-mail: John_Sweeney@xxxxxxxxxx

http://www.ibm.com/easyaccess/publicsector
Become More Energy Efficient: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/optimizeit/cost_efficiency/energy_efficiency/


Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU




_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev


Back to the top