[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [higgins-dev] Two bug fixes to HOWL (higgins.owl) [non breakingchange]
|
Paul,
2) bug fix: allowed the range of higgins:attribute to be either
higgins:Value (as it was) or higgins:Attribute (new--this object is the
holder of metadata about the entire set of values (i.e. "ranges") of a set
of higgins:attributes
1. SimpleValue can not contain attributes (only ComplexValue can), so it
will be more correct to allow the range of higgins:attribute to be
ComplexValue, not Value.
2. Really higgins:attribute is a property of DS (or complex value) that
contains higgins:Value (simple or complex). What sence is there for
higgins:Attribute class to be the range of higgins:attribute? Do you mean
that we should use the same property to store as values of attribute as
metadata of this attribute?
Thanks,
Sergey Lyakhov
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Trevithick" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions'"
<higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 6:01 PM
Subject: [higgins-dev] Two bug fixes to HOWL (higgins.owl) [non
breakingchange]
1) bug fix: allowed the domain of higgins:attribute to be either
DigitalSubject (as it was) or ContextObject (new)
2) bug fix: allowed the range of higgins:attribute to be either
higgins:Value (as it was) or higgins:Attribute (new--this object is the
holder of metadata about the entire set of values (i.e. "ranges") of a set
of higgins:attributes
Changes have been published here [1]
[1] http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins.owl
-Paul
_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
