| Re: [higgins-dev] Breaking changes to IdAS for switch to Java 1.4 |
|
.diff files attached.
As you can see, the changes are ridiculously trivial and took about 3 minutes. I unwisely thought this would save down time.
Jm
>>> Michael McIntosh <mikemci@xxxxxxxxxx> 3/21/07 6:57 AM >>> Jim, Where can I see these changes you made to STS? Thanks, Mike higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 03/21/2007 02:25:08 AM: > You mean, announcing and checking in on the same day might not be > enough time for component owners to review and give feedback? I > agree, this was a special circumstance. I already thwarted chaos by > making Mike's (extremely trivial) changes for him. > > Normally, I do this: > 1) Talk about and gather consensus regarding a change. > 2) Implement the agreed-upon change (may take days or weeks). > 3) Announce that the change is ready and will be checked in after a > day or two. > 4) Barring any further contention, check in after waiting the > announced number of days. > > This time, I made the time period in step three less than 24 hours. > Step 1 was begun two weeks ago on the list and Mike and others > already gave feedback that resulted in the changes below (messages: > http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/higgins-dev/msg01752.html, > http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/higgins-dev/msg01754.html, > http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/higgins-dev/msg01759.html, and > http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/higgins-dev/msg01760.html) > > So, I'm giving step 3 another day at Tony's prompting. Does anyone > have issues with the changes below? It would be best (I believe) > for these to be checked in asap so component owners don't have to > make unnecessary repeated trips through their code. I consider > silence consent. > > Jim > > >>> Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx> 3/20/07 7:39 PM >>> > Tom, I expect that the changes be cleared with the component owner > first, they review the changes before anyone commits, this is how > most all the Eclipse projects work, So yes this can get very chaotic > if we don't get some serialization > > Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122 > [image removed] "Tom Doman" <TDoman@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > "Tom Doman" <TDoman@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent by: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx > 03/20/2007 05:40 PM > > Please respond to > "Higgins \(Trust Framework\) Project developer discussions" > <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > [image removed] > To > > [image removed] > <higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > [image removed] > cc > > [image removed] > <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > [image removed] > Subject > > [image removed] > Re: [higgins-dev] Breaking changes to IdAS for switch to Java 1.4 > > [image removed] > > [image removed] > > > Tony, > > I think Jim's e-mail IS the announcement to all component owners. > Also, as Jim said below "I've already made the appropriate changes > in the JNDI CP and in the STS components". Doesn't look all that > chaotic to me. > > Tom > > >>> Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx> 03/20/07 4:21 PM >>> > > > > > > You should check with the component owners before you check in code, like > Mike for the STS, otherwise it will be chaos > > Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122 > > > > "Jim Sermersheim" > <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx > > To > Sent by: <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> > higgins-dev-bounc cc > es@xxxxxxxxxxx > Subject > Re: [higgins-dev] Breaking changes > 03/20/2007 09:33 to IdAS for switch to Java 1.4 > AM > > > Please respond to > "Higgins \(Trust > Framework\) > Project developer > discussions" > <higgins-dev@ecli > pse.org> > > > > > > > Javadoc is at > http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/org.eclipse.higgins.docs/idas/ > > >>> "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> 3/20/07 8:03 AM >>> > The following changes will be checked in today unless someone has a > problem with them: > > > * IdAS > * All Iterable<> arguments and return values change to Iterator > * All List<> arguments and return values change to Iterator > ** Replace IRelationship<URI> with IContextRelationship > ** IContext.buildRelationship now returns an IContextRelationship > > * JNDI CP fixes to conform to IdAS changes > > * STS fixes to conform to IdAS changes > > The reason I want to check these in now rather than wait a few days is > because I've already made the appropriate changes in the JNDI CP and in > the STS components, and all other affected component are already broken > from the last set of changes -- they may as well work through these at the > same time. > > Jim_______________________________________________ > higgins-dev mailing list > higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev > > _______________________________________________ > higgins-dev mailing list > higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev > _______________________________________________ > higgins-dev mailing list > higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev _______________________________________________ higgins-dev mailing list higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev |
Attachment:
org.eclipse.higgins.sts.binding.axis1x.service.diff
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
org.eclipse.higgins.sts.extension.samltoken.diff
Description: Binary data