[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [higgins-dev] Re: IdAS Registry conf call

I may not fully understand - but I have reservations about using the CP 
factory classname to identify an instance of a CP.
I think I'd like to be able to configure a system using two LDAP CPs, each 
configured to point at a different LDAP Server.


higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/12/2007 11:36:27 PM:

> The one open issue which must be resolved is the datatype of the 
> cpid (the thing that identifies a context provider).  It has been 
> suggested that this should just be the classname of the CP's 
> IContextFactory.  At this point, I favor this solution, and further 
> note that if we see no real need for a CP factory config data (apart
> from what could be added to the contextConfig), then there's no 
> longer a need for IdASRegistry as proposed -- leaving us with only 
> one registry again.
> Jim
> >>> "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> 2/10/07 1:02 AM >>>
> I volunteered to shepherd this issue, and the first thing I did was 
> try to update the wiki with what seemed to be consensus to me at the
> end of the call.  Please review that and comment -- especially on 
> the Out Of Scope Use Cases, TODO items, and Open Issues.
> If there are use cases that need to be in scope, I'll move them to 
> the Open Issues section.  Unless I was spacing out, we neglected to 
> talk about the TODO solutions.
> Andy,  Paul said you'd be willing to work on the IdASContextRegistry
> section of the Wiki, and on its implementation.  There may be things
> that we need to explain more (in terms of requirements), and I also 
> had some questions that you or Paul might be able to answer (search 
> for "questions from Jim").  I'll try to sync up with you on Monday.
> Thanks,
> Jim
> >>> "Paul Trevithick" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2/8/07 10:22 PM >>>
> If you're on the "To" line of this email, then I'm expecting you to call 
> (a total of 8). I've reserved 10 lines so if we get a couple more, we'll 
> okay. I'm assuming this will run 1-1.5 hours.
> Comments/Agenda: 
> * http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/IdAS_Registries_Proposal 
> * Fielding comments, questions about the (optional) XRI resolution
>   technology (Drummond and Andy are the experts on this)
> * Reusable abstract Registry component underneath IdASRegistry and 
> * General discussion
> Date:
> Friday, February 09, 2007
> Start Time:
> 11:00 AM Eastern Std Time
> End Time:
> 12:55 PM Eastern Std Time
> Dial-in Number:
> 1-641-696-6699 (Iowa)
> Participant Access Code:
> 425999
> -Paul_______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev