| Re: [higgins-dev] LDAP Context Provider provisional approval |
|
<resend>
In examining the set of "non-generic-JNDI-isms" in the CP... Oddly enough, this isn't one of them.
JNDI itself adopted "LDAP string representation for filters" as it's standard filter format. Thus, any JNDI provider has to deal with LDAP filters. The only reason we include LDAP.jar was for some utility functions that help us build these LDAP filters. We don't use any other aspect of that jar file.
Jim
>>> Michael McIntosh <mikemci@xxxxxxxxxx> 2/9/07 6:30 AM >>> Tom, Not sure but suspect Tony's point was related to the dependancy on LDAP.jar - a more generic JNDI implementation would presumably not need that jar. Thanks, Mike higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/08/2007 08:09:09 PM: > You thought correctly, it continues to be referred to doubly as the > "LDAP CP" because that's where we've been pointing it. Any > assistance in properly addressing it would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > Tom > > >>> Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx> 02/08/07 6:05 PM >>> > I thought this was a JNDI CP ? > > ----------------- > Yet another BlackBerry 8700c User. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Doman" [TDoman@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 02/08/2007 06:00 PM > To: <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [higgins-dev] LDAP Context Provider provisional approval > > > > Mary, (tried mary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx but got bounced back) > > I don't know where there's a package containing all the source for > the ldap.jar but it is all freely available for perusal online here: > http://www.openldap.org/devel/cvsweb.cgi/com/novell/ldap/? > cvsroot=JLDAP&hideattic=1&sortbydate=0. I assume that's sufficient > for Eclipse purposes. > > Thanks, > Tom > > >>> "Mary Ruddy" <mary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 02/08/07 4:02 PM >>> > It is my pleasure to announce that according to Eclipse legal: > > "The code contained in the LDAP Context Provider Attachment can be > checked into CVS." > > There is still more work to be done for us to get all the dependencies > approved, and we have uncovered another piece of dependency source code > that we need to get Eclipse legal, but this is a major step forward. > _______________________________________________ > higgins-dev mailing list > higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev > _______________________________________________ > higgins-dev mailing list > higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev > _______________________________________________ > higgins-dev mailing list > higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev _______________________________________________ higgins-dev mailing list higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev |