We are already recording most of this
information on the download pages and various associated objects (0.6.0
N20061215 was last night’s IdAS build.) and could use it to more fully
label the .jar. In what way
do you mean the build date is not reliable? Do you mean because it is not part of
the .jar name? Would labeling the
jar …0.6.0.N20061215 meet your needs?
-----Original Message-----
From:
higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Sermersheim
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 2:07 PM
To: higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [higgins-dev] versioning
higgins libraries
A recurring issue that pops up is
that of versioning idas.jar. As it is, people only have the date to rely
on, but that's not reliable.
I assume we'd want a number
that includes a major version, minor version, and build number. It'd good
to have the build number auto increment. I stubbed out the beginnings of
an attempt at this in the idas build.xml, but haven't gotten any further.
Maybe the best thing to do is to
get someone to own this task.
