[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [higgins-dev] A topic for Nov 2 phone call
|
I agree, i am only asking how we can simplify our goals by using as much
of the cardspace architecture and available components as they exist
within the client space ( vista, xp, 2003 )
Jeffrey C. Broberg
CA
Senior Architect, Development
Tel: +1-508-628-8490
Jeffrey.Broberg@xxxxxx
<mailto:Jeffrey.Broberg@xxxxxx> <http://www.ca.com/>
________________________________
From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Nadalin
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 12:08 PM
To: Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions
Cc: Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions;
higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [higgins-dev] A topic for Nov 2 phone call
I'm confused by your comment. Higgins project is building a
Browser Extension, Identity Selector, Identity Attribute Service,
Context Providers and Security Token Service, if you want to be
interopeable with Cardspace there are IP items in the Browser Extension,
Identity Selector and Relying Party that we have called out in
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Draft_Response_to_Open_Specification_P
romise.
Also how you intend in using MS selector without solving the IP
issues ?
Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
"Broberg, Jeffrey C" <Jeffrey.Broberg@xxxxxx>
"Broberg, Jeffrey C"
<Jeffrey.Broberg@xxxxxx>
Sent by: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
11/02/2006 10:54 AM
Please respond to
"Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions"
<higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To
"Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions"
<higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
<higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
RE: [higgins-dev] A topic for Nov 2 phone call
shouldnt we focus on figuring out those problems and use the MS
selector and just focus on the higgins RP and IDP ?
Jeffrey C. Broberg
CA
Senior Architect, Development
Tel: +1-508-628-8490
Jeffrey.Broberg@xxxxxx <mailto:Jeffrey.Broberg@xxxxxx>
<http://www.ca.com/>
________________________________
From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Nadalin
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 9:04 PM
To: Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions
Cc: 'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions';
higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [higgins-dev] A topic for Nov 2 phone call
I doubt it, as there are issues on RP and wire formats, card
formats
Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
"Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx>
"Jim Sermersheim"
<jimse@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
11/01/2006 03:40 PM
Please respond to
"Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions"
<higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To
"'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions'"
<higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
RE: [higgins-dev] A topic for Nov 2 phone call
If this particular demo (or this phase of this demo) doesn't use
a Higgins ISS, but instead uses the CardSpace selector from Microsoft,
does it alleviate the issues for now?
>>> "Mary Ruddy" <mary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 11/1/06 2:14 PM >>>
The area of concern is the ISS. Eclipse legal is currently
revising the
Higgins draft response to Microsoft's Open Specification
Promise.
-----Original Message-----
From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf Of Jim Sermersheim
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 3:58 PM
To: 'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions'
Subject: Re: [higgins-dev] A topic for Nov 2 phone call
Which modules or aspects of the demo we want to show have
outstanding IP
issues?
>>> Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx> 11/1/06 1:04 PM >>>
So what can be shown/implemented legally from an Eclipse
perspective
since we don't have all the IP issues resolved ?
Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
"Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx>
"Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
11/01/2006 01:45 PM Please respond to
"Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions"
<higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To
"'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions'"
<higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[higgins-dev] A topic for Nov 2 phone call
Mary,
Dale thought it would be good to talk on the phone call about
what we
have planned for the demo/application first mentioned here. The
topic
would cover:
* What is it?
** More of a interoperability/integration demo at this point
** Show integration between a Media Wiki (RP), CardSpace (IE7 +
.net),
STS, and IdAS.
* What components are required?
* Tasks
** What tasks need to be completed?
** Who is working on the tasks
** How far along are we?
* Methods for communicating/collaborating.
I suspect this could take between 10 minutes (assuming there are
very
few questions) and 30 minutes or more.
_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins
<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins> -dev
_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins
<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins>
-dev_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev>
_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
