RE: [higgins-dev] Some basic goals/principles of Higgins

[Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx>]

So I believe that we should discuss at the F2F as the laws while being "idealistically" not sure that Higgins already does not violate some portions of these, not sure this is bad either

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
"Mary Ruddy" <mary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Mary Ruddy" <mary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

10/31/2006 01:38 PM

Please respond to
"Higgins \(Trust Framework\) Project developer discussions" <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions'" <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [higgins-dev] Some basic goals/principles of Higgins

Though there hasn’t been conversation about the Laws of Identity on this list, the Laws of Identity are “idealistically” compatible with the principles behind SocialPhysics which drove the initial creation of the Higgins project.

-----Original Message-----
From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Nadalin
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 2:24 PM
To: higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [higgins-dev] Some basic goals/principles of Higgins

I noticed that we don't say anything about proposed "Laws of Identity" that Microsoft has created and to some extent (I have not seen an exact statement) is driving Cardspace. So we believe that Higgins should be "idealistically" be driving towards these laws ?

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev