[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[higgins-dev] Re: Proposed Version 1: Higgins based LDAP OWL ontology
|
Yep. I'm exercising "garbage in, garbage out" on that one for now. The LDAP server I'm getting that from is a simple test server that doesn't even validate entries against the schema anyway.
FWIW, the third and last one is ...
A supposed "Unknown Resource" error on my owl import statement. It's weird because it DOES find and display all the Higgins ontology and (after "fixing" the & problem) the relationships between the generated ontology and the Higgins ontology. Here's what SemanticWorks says isn't OWL-DL:
Invalid OWL DL syntax in owl:imports-statement: <http://www.bandit-project.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/ldap> owl:imports <http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins.owl>
Unknown Resource <http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins.owl>. In OWL DL a type for every individual is mandatory (beside 'owl:DeprecatedClass' or 'owl:DeprecatedProperty').
Any of you OWLites know what SemanticWorks is getting at in #2?
Tom Doman
Novell Inc.
>>> Mark Wahl <Mark.Wahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 9/30/2006 12:27 PM >>>
Tom Doman wrote:
> Besides the two small items I mentioned earlier,
Is one of those items the issue that your file is not OWL-DL due to
the absence of a definition of attr_authorityRevocationList?
Mark Wahl
Informed Control Inc.
_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
