| [higgins-dev] Updated Generated LDAP Ontology |
I went and downloaded a 30 day evaluation copy of Altova's SemanticWorks 2006 and was able to answer several of my questions. 1. As Paul said, it indeed handles the "&" so I'm considering that issue resolved. Protégé just isn't going to cut it as an OWL editor for us for that and other reasons I'll detail. 2. As I last sent it, my generated ontology was indeed, OWL-Full. However, it was not OWL-DL and, as Mark said, we need the equivalencies defined in our ontology to make it OWL-DL. I decided to try them as global (without the '#') definitions which is what I wanted from the beginning and, voila, it works just fine. Again, Protégé sent me off on a needless chase. So, I'm also considering this issue resolved. The only things that are currently preventing the attached ontology from being error free as OWL-DL are: 1. The absence of authorityRevocationList as an attribute definition (I'm currently adopting a garbage in, garbage out philosophy on this one). 2. The absence of the some of the base types we discussed like Base64BinaryDatatypeAttribute and StringDatatypeAttribute at http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins.owl. Paul, could you put Higgins0.5.6.owl at this URL? Next, I'm moving on to syntax definitions. BTW, I'm maintaining a list of LDAP specific OWL issues that I'll e-mail out later under separate cover. Any comments or feedback on my latest ontology? Thanks, Tom Doman Novell Inc.
Attachment:
testLDAP.owl
Description: Binary data