[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [henshin-dev] Sierpinski above and beyond
|
Hi Christian,
Am 30.11.2010 09:20, schrieb Christian Krause:
Hi,
I believe Enrico tested that already once and he did not manage to
get a 'level' further. Anyway: I'm using the minimal
implementation also for the state space model, and it should
indeed save quite some memory.
Oh, I wasn't aware of that. The memory improvement sounds quite huge
though.
About Sierpinski: I wanna do another benchmark but for that I need
to limit the maximum iteration depth. I figured the easiest way to
do that is to add an integer attribute to the nodes that I
increase on every step. Then I can just add a NAC so that it will
stop at a certain depth. I guess I rather make a copy of the
Sierpinski model and trafo for that, right?
Yeah, a copy to an alternative Sierpinski version would be a good
idea. Beside the depth of iteration the relation to a potential
decrease in performance would be interesting in addition.
greetx, Stefan
Ciao,
Christian
Am 30.11.2010 10:05, schrieb Stefan Jurack:
Hi guys,
if there is anyone bored of sharpen pencils and stuff, he might
want to take a look at "MinimalEObjectImpl" (e.g. see http://ed-merks.blogspot.com/2009/01/emf-ultra-slim-diet.html).
According to the reduction in size of EObjects the "Worst case
kinds of numbers are 124 bytes reduced to 16 bytes" (citation of
Ed M.).
If would be interesting to know, on the one hand, how
much is the decrease in performance and, on the other
hand, how much nodes can be handled by the
Sierpinski transformation example in such a case.
Best regards,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
henshin-dev mailing list
henshin-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/henshin-dev
_______________________________________________
henshin-dev mailing list
henshin-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/henshin-dev
|
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
