Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [gmf-dev] GMF-Tooling project lead

Mickael,

Yes, I like a fast approach too.  I'm just not sure the EMO will approve it.  We'll need them to comment about what's a suitable process in this somewhat dysfunctional situation.  It it might well be faster to start a thread "Proposed New GMF Tooling Leader" and get all the active committers to +1 the proposal.  Then it's absolutely clear that the will of the committers is demonstrated and recorded.

Regards,
Ed


On 06/10/2011 5:23 AM, Mickael Istria wrote:
Ed,

I think it will make things more complex/long. Changing project lead of GMF Tooling is already something that should have been done lots of monthes ago, and that has always been delayed for several reasons.
Then I am in favor of a faster approach: Anthony makes Michael Golubev project lead (with both Anthony's +1 and mine, the vote is OK), and when it is done, we'll probably think about removing Artem committer status on GMF Tooling.

Does it sound "legally" good enough?

On 05/10/2011 19:55, Ed Merks wrote:
Anthony,

Could the committers have an election?  Perhaps anyone who doesn't vote can be decommiterized...


On 05/10/2011 10:04 AM, Anthony Hunter wrote:
Hi Team,

I have not heard from Artem that he wants to lead GMF Tooling anymore nor have I heard from anyone speaking on his behalf.

Michael Golubev will be the new GMF Tooling project lead. I will work with the modeling PMC and the EMO to make the change.

Cheers...
Anthony




From:        Anthony Hunter/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
To:        "GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:        09/13/2011 09:35 AM
Subject:        [gmf-dev] GMF-Tooling project lead
Sent by:        gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx




Hi Team,

"
Anthony, could you please approve upgrading the version of GMF-T to 3.0 for the Juno release? "

Well, I suppose the project lead would approve first. I am thinking Artem is not around again. We are still waiting for his approval for the release review. I am thinking it may be in the best interest of the project for Artem to step down as project lead and we make Michael Golubev the project lead. To be fair, we need to give the community a bit of time to reply back any concerns.


Michael, is it great that you now have a team of three of GMF Tooling. I have no opinion either way if GMF Tooling is 3.0 in Juno. I would proceed with the project plan and allow the community to comment.


Cheers...
Anthony





From:        
Michael Golubev <golubev@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:        
"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:        
09/13/2011 08:06 AM
Subject:        
[gmf-dev] GMF-Tooling in Juno -- can we plan for 3.0 (major)        release this year
Sent by:        
gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx




Hello,  

While we are waiting for a release review for GMF-T 2.4, I would invite everyone to put efforts into the planning for next release.

I am glad to confirm that for this year we have got a sponsorship from Avaloq Evolution AG, which is willing to support team of 3 developers working specifically on GMF-Tooling.  
I am creating the draft proposal of the project plan now, will commit it shortly and post the main proposed topics here for discussion.  

However, it is already clear for me that in order to deliver the new features we need Juno release to be a major one, thus 3.0 instead of 2.x.  
The reason is, we will have to change models significantly, and we will not be able to provide automatic backward compatibility with the models created for 2.4.x  
(we will of course follow the transition procedure from the past of GMF-T and will develop 'Migrate Model' actions to support migration of existing models).  

Anthony, could you please approve upgrading the version of GMF-T to 3.0 for the Juno release?  

Also I am not sure how we can add into the Bugzilla the new set of milestones (no matter whether it is 3.0 M2, M3... or 2.5 M2, M3...).  
If someone know how to do that please advice me, it would help with pushing the project plan proposal into Bugzilla.

Regards,  
Michael

--

Michael "Borlander" Golubev

Eclipse Committer (GMF, UML2Tools)
at Montages Think Tank, Prague, Czech Republic


Montages AG
Stampfenbachstr. 48, CH-8006 Zürich


tel:    +41 44 260 75 57

mob: +420 602 483 463


_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev

_______________________________________________ gmf-dev mailing list gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev


--

Mickael Istria
R&D Engineer, Eclipse Plug-in RCP Developer

PetalsLink - Open Source SOA

My blog - My Tweets



_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev

Back to the top