Vlad,
Comments below.
varnica@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Mates,
Artem spent so many years on this project and is the creator of GMF.
We should have more respect for his job, his painful personal
decision to stop his contribution and certainly not critic him so
violently in previous emails !!
You're the expert in violent criticism and are really the last person
who should be giving out lessons in respect. Artem has clearly done
quality work that others would like to keep moving forward. How much
bigger compliment can one get for the fruits of one's labors?
I would like to know from him why he thinks it is better not to join
Indigo train.
I think he was pretty clear when he said:
Given limited resources, I would suggest GMF tooling
project not to
join Indigo train, otherwise being aligned with the its release
schedule. However, if Mickael I. would like to take the responsibility
and the burden :) there'd be no objection, I believe.
Others are willing to take on the burden so I don't think he'll have
cause for objection.
In my
experience I always remember that when a lead architect/developer
makes such a decision there was good reasons.
Could we get more details ?
That's up to Artem to provide if he so chooses. He's certainly not
obligated to share his personal life with others however...
I can
understand that Artem doesn't want to talk about it anymore,
therefore if no answer there is no obligation.
Regards,
Vlad,
Ed Merks wrote:
Guys,
I too agree. There is the general expectation that once you commit to
being on the train you will remain on the train because other projects
might well be on the train only if your project is on it. It's
essential that those willing to step up and do the work be enabled in
that effort.
Regards,
Ed
Mickael Istria wrote:
Suggesting "GMF tooling
project
not to join Indigo train" because you have no time to lead the project
is not a good solution. GMF Tooling leaving the release train is the
worst
case scenario. Hopefully others in the development community can
express
a similar opinion.
I totally agree with Anthony, leaving the release train would be a
major regression for GMF Tooling, and then for the whole GMP project.
This must not happen.
--
Mickael Istria
R&D Engineer
This message and any attachment (the "message") is
intended solely for
the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message by
mistake, please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Any use
not in accordance with its purpose, any out-spread or disclosure,
either as a whole or partially, is prohibited except with formal
approval. Internet cannot guarantee the integrity of this message,
therefore BonitaSoft will not be liable for the message if modified.
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
|
