Re: [gmf-dev] Patches review

[Anthony Hunter <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Mariot

We are reviewing 278923 since it is an alleged regression. These rest would likely be SR1 unless you are formally saying that these are stop ship defects.

Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components
IBM Rational Software: Aurora / GEF / GMF / Modeling Tools
Phone: 613-270-4613


Richard Gronback ---06/10/2009 10:24:48 AM---At this point (post-RC4), it's unlikely these will make it into 2.2.0. Please take a look at the ra

From:	Richard Gronback <Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:	"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	06/10/2009 10:24 AM
Subject:	Re: [gmf-dev] Patches review

---

At this point (post-RC4), it's unlikely these will make it into 2.2.0.  Please take a look at the ramp down policy for how to get approval at this stage: http://wiki.eclipse.org/Modeling_Project_Ramp_Down_Policy

The last two are not marked at severity/priority levels that qualify, btw.

Thanks,
Rich


On 6/10/09 9:24 AM, "Mariot Chauvin" <mariot.chauvin@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi team,

I would like to fix the following bugs before Galileo release :

- https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=278923 "Truncation problem in diagrams"
- https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=278253 "Edge reconnection in structure where tree router is used does not set correctly the routing
style of the edge"
- https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=279281 "[Layout] Unable to move branches with tree style routing"

Could someone review the patches I provided, in order I commit them ?

Thanks,
Regards

Mariot
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev


_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev