Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [gmf-dev] Re: [FAILURE / 6 F, 178 W] GMF HEAD Build 2.2.0 /N200905050649 done [07:43]

Title: Re: [gmf-dev] Re: [FAILURE / 6 F, 178 W] GMF HEAD Build 2.2.0 / N200905050649 done [07:43]
And, btw, diagram.ui tests fail for me on Windows. Same 5 that fail on the build machine. All GMF plugins are from HEAD.


From: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Artem Tikhomirov
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 5:33 PM
To: GMF Project developer discussions.
Subject: RE: [gmf-dev] Re: [FAILURE / 6 F,178 W] GMF HEAD Build 2.2.0 /N200905050649 done [07:43]

I've just committed the change, and the test should pass next time.
 
Artem


From: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Gronback
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 5:24 PM
To: GMF Project developer discussions.
Subject: Re: [gmf-dev] Re: [FAILURE / 6 F, 178 W] GMF HEAD Build 2.2.0 /N200905050649 done [07:43]

Hi Alex,

What platform did you run these tests on, btw?  Linux, or Windows?

Artem, any update on the one tooling test failure?

If we all have passing tests locally, anyone object to promoting an M7 build with test failures on the build machine?

Thanks,
Rich


On 5/5/09 12:05 PM, "Oleksandr Boyko" <Oleksandr_Boyko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi all,

I ran runtime.diagram.ui JUnits and they are all passing, including those 5 that failed for the build. Looking at the stack trace of the failures it looks a lot like the bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=266848 that I fixed for M7. Is there a possibility that this fix is not included in the build somehow?

Cheers,
Alex

Richard Gronback ---05/05/2009 08:56:39 AM---It seems we're still waiting on EMF QTV, M2M QVT, and OCL M7 builds.



_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev

Back to the top