[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [gmf-dev] Bi-weekly call agenda
|
I guess the problem I have with something like "future" is that it feels a
lot like the RESOLVED/LATER problem we have agreed to not do at Eclipse
anymore. Who will look at them again?
It seems you're happy with the 2.1 and milestones, plus a 3.0 target.
Artem, seem OK to you?
Thanks,
Rich
On 6/19/07 9:37 AM, "Anthony Hunter" <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Agreed, Perhaps we should add the target milestone "Future". Other
> components have "Future".
>
> Then we can bulk move to Future:
>
> "Did not make 2.0, moving to a future release. Originator should comment or
> change the priority if the request is critical in nature".
>
> Cheers...
> Anthony
> --
> Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
> Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components
> IBM Rational Software: Aurora / Modeling Tools
> Phone: 613-591-7037
>
>
>
>
> From: "Artem Tikhomirov" <Artem.Tikhomirov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> To: "GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Date: 19/06/2007 09:30 AM
>
> Subject RE: [gmf-dev] Bi-weekly call agenda
> :
>
>
>
>
>
> '---' is not very handy - newly submitted requests get it by default and
> it's just inconvenient to see both 'later' and 'not yet processed' in the
> same list.
>
> Artem
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Gronback
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 1:31 PM
>> To: GMF Project developer discussions.
>> Subject: Re: [gmf-dev] Bi-weekly call agenda
>>
>> I added 2.0.1 and 2.0.2
>>
>> The 'future' milestone is usually indicated with '---'. I'm
>> not sure what other kind of milestone we could set, or if we
>> even should. Ideas?
>>
>> - Rich
>>
>>
>> On 6/19/07 5:22 AM, "Artem Tikhomirov"
>> <Artem.Tikhomirov@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I suggest we add 2.0.x target milestones to Bugzilla and
>> perhaps some
>>> kind of 'future' milestone to denote requests that are not
>> planned for
>>> next release but helpwanted/may be considered later. Bulk
>> move to 2.1
>>> is easy but not that sensible ;)
>>>
>>> Artem
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> [mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Gronback
>>>> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 11:57 PM
>>>> To: GMF Project developer discussions.
>>>> Subject: Re: [gmf-dev] Bi-weekly call agenda
>>>>
>>>> Let's all try to cleanup Bugzilla, then we'll have a clear view of
>>>> what's left. I'm traveling this evening, but will try to sync
>>>> Deskzilla and run through all those still in 2.0/RCM7.
>>>>
>>>> Sure, if you have some for 2.0 you'd like to discuss on the call
>>>> tomorrow, please list on the wiki. If there are none
>> listed, we'll
>>>> know not to dial in.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Rich
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6/18/07 8:58 AM, "Anthony Hunter" <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Maybe we should list the Bugzillas we plan to do for the release?
>>>>> Should we do this today?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers...
>>>>> Anthony
>>>>> --
>>>>> Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx Software Development
>>>>> Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components IBM Rational
>>>> Software: Aurora
>>>>> / Modeling Tools
>>>>> Phone: 613-591-7037
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> To: "GMF Project developer discussions."
>> <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: 18/06/2007 06:52 AM
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject [gmf-dev] Bi-weekly call agenda
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there anything to discuss this time, or are we all set
>>>> to build 2.0?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/GMF_Dev_Calls
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Rich
>>>>> --
>>>>> Richard C. Gronback
>>>>> Borland Software Corporation
>>>>> richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> +1 860 227 9215_______________________________________________
>>>>> gmf-dev mailing list
>>>>> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> gmf-dev mailing list
>>>>> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Richard C. Gronback
>>>> Borland Software Corporation
>>>> richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> +1 860 227 9215
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gmf-dev mailing list
>>>> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gmf-dev mailing list
>>> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>>
>> --
>> Richard C. Gronback
>> Borland Software Corporation
>> richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> +1 860 227 9215
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gmf-dev mailing list
>> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> gmf-dev mailing list
> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmf-dev mailing list
> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
--
Richard C. Gronback
Borland Software Corporation
richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 860 227 9215
