[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [gmf-dev] Today's call
|
Hi,
When I run org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.emf.core.types unit tests the
test_getElementType_eObject_eClass() is ran after
test_getElementTypes_155601() and test_getMetamodelTypes_155601() and hence
I never saw the failures. So, yes, those 2 tests fail, because of the order
in which they are ran - an extra metamodel type gets registered and stays
there.
I'll try to fix this by specifying a different client context for an
inserted metamodel type in test_getElementType_eObject_eClass().
Thanks for the tip Max.
Cheers,
Alex
"Max Feldman"
<Max.Feldman@borl
and.com> To
Sent by: "GMF Project developer
gmf-dev-bounces@e discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
clipse.org cc
Subject
25/04/2007 08:43 RE: [gmf-dev] Today's call
AM
Please respond to
"GMF Project
developer
discussions."
<gmf-dev@eclipse.
org>
Hi,
I've put some traces into ElementTypeRegistryTest.class, to print out
all elementTypes in the test_getElementTypes_155601(), and below is the
output I get:
MetamodelType[org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.emf.type.core.context.office
]
MetamodelType[org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.emf.type.core.context.client
]
MetamodelType[org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.emf.type.core.context.depart
ment]
MetamodelType[org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.emf.type.core.context.custom
er]
MetamodelType[org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.emf.type.core.context.studen
t]
MetamodelType[dynamic.org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.emf.type.core.eclass
] !!!
MetamodelType[org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.emf.type.core.context.employ
ee]
SpecializationType[org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.emf.type.core.context.m
anager]
SpecializationType[org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.emf.type.core.context.e
xecutive]
SpecializationType[org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.emf.type.core.context.t
opSecret]
SpecializationType[org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.emf.type.core.context.s
ecretDepartment]
Note that the dynamic.org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.emf.type.core.eclass
is the MetamodelType which is not expected here, and which looks to be
registered in test_getElementType_eObject_eClass() and is never
unregistered. Probably the latter one is either not run in your
configuration in contrast with the builder config, or it's an ordering
problem...
Any ideas?
Best regards,
Max
-----Original Message-----
From: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Oleksandr Boyko
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 12:44 AM
To: GMF Project developer discussions.
Cc: GMF Project developer discussions.; gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gmf-dev] Today's call
I'm looking into those 2 unit tests failures, but so far I didn't seem
to
get either one of those tests to fail.
My setup:
1) GMF integration I20070420 + all the required components (as specified
on
the build page - everything M6 and EMF I200704191605)
2) Got the org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.emf.type.core from head and ran
AllTests as JUnit plugin test
3) Did that on WinXP and Linux Red Hat
The tests never failed. In fact those 2 tests were not failing on WinXP
for
me 2 weeks ago when we had 3 failures in the plugin above (so I had only
1
failure, which has been fixed in EMF).
Is there anything specific about the way you run the tests? Any ideas at
all why would they fail for you?
Thanks.
Cheers,
Alex
Mohammed
Mostafa/Ottawa/IB
M@IBMCA
To
Sent by: "GMF Project developer
gmf-dev-bounces@e discussions."
<gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
clipse.org
cc
Subject
24/04/2007 04:03 Re: [gmf-dev] Today's call
PM
Please respond to
"GMF Project
developer
discussions."
<gmf-dev@eclipse.
org>
We are looking into these 2 failures now. I'm hopping we will have an
update soon as possible
Mohammed Mostafa
Rational Software | IBM Software Group
770 Palladium Drive
Kanata, ON, Canada, K2V 1C8
tel: 613 591 7928
mmostafa@xxxxxxxxxx
Richard Gronback
<richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by:
To
gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx "GMF Project developer
discussions."
<gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
04/24/2007 10:05 AM
cc
Subject
Please respond to Re: [gmf-dev] Today's call
"GMF Project developer
discussions."
<gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Agreed, we should do some Bugzilla cleanup.
Also, is there an estimate of when we can get our 2 unit test failures
addressed? As I recall, we're waiting on EMF. (?)
Thanks,
Rich
On 4/24/07 9:18 AM, "Anthony Hunter" <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Sounds good, lets schedule the next one for May 8.
>
> We should have a goal of closing on the Bugzilla list we created. For
May
8
> we should have the target milestone set appropriately:
>
> 2.0 M7 - will complete for M7
> 2.0 RC - will complete before 2.0 GA.
> 2.1 - will not make 2.0 GA.
>
> Cheers...
> Anthony
> --
> Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
> Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components
> IBM Rational Software: Aurora / Modeling Tools
> Phone: 613-591-7037
>
>
>
>
> From: Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> To: "GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Date: 24/04/2007 08:40 AM
>
> Subject [gmf-dev] Today's call
> :
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>> From the wiki, it seems we have no items to discuss this week.
Therefore,
> I?ll assume we can skip today?s call unless someone says otherwise.
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/GMF_Dev_Calls
>
> Thanks,
> Rich
> --
> Richard C. Gronback
> Borland Software Corporation
> richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
> +1 860 227 9215_______________________________________________
> gmf-dev mailing list
> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmf-dev mailing list
> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
--
Richard C. Gronback
Borland Software Corporation
richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 860 227 9215
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
