RE: [gmf-dev] Proposal for an early GMF 1.0.2 release

[Anthony Hunter <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry Artem, missed this email.

We are propagating fixes we make to
both streams the same day.
 
Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Manager: Eclipse GMF + GEF
IBM Rational Software: Aurora / Modeling Tools 
Phone: 613-591-7037

"Artem Tikhomirov" <Artem.Tikhomirov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/10/2006 05:04 AM

Please respond to
"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [gmf-dev] Proposal for an early GMF 1.0.2 release

Anthony,
 
 Could you please describe
commit policy runtime team going to adhere during 1.0.2 and 1.0.3 development
- i.e. is it the same as with 1.0.1 (no fixes in 2.0 stream, all fixes
from maintenance stream get into HEAD at the end of a cycle), or we might
expect to see fixes propagated to 2.0 right away.
 
Thank you!
 
Best wishes,
Artem Tikhomirov

---

From: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Hunter
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 10:34 PM
To: GMF Project developer discussions.
Subject: Re: [gmf-dev] Proposal for an early GMF 1.0.2 release


I have updated the maintenance section in http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/GMF_Project_Plan

Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Manager: Eclipse GMF + GEF
IBM Rational Software: Aurora / Modeling Tools 
Phone: 613-591-7037

Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

04/10/2006 06:41 AM

Please respond to
"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [gmf-dev] Proposal for an early GMF 1.0.2 release

This seems reasonable to me, and has limited impact to releng.  The
29th is a Sunday, so perhaps the 27th is better?  We’ll just need
to update our plan documents to reflect this additional release.

Thanks,
Rich


On 10/3/06 4:42 PM, "Anthony Hunter" <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


Hi Team, 

The WTP project has requested a maintenance release for October 29. The
request has been approved by the WTP PMC and here is the link to the thread.
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/wtp-pmc/msg00896.html

I have been requested by the IBM team to do the same for GMF. UML2 and
TPTP are also looking at doing this. 

Here's what I propose for your agreement (or dissent). 

We will plan a 1.0.2 maintenance release for October 29. 
We will still plan a 1.0.3 maintenance release approximately January/February
following the rest of Callisto release train. 

We currently have 10 Bugzillas targeted against the 1.0.2 maintenance release.

It is unfortunate these issues were found late, but I think we can accommodate
this "extra release"  with minimal disruption, 
if we keep the fixes to the bare minimum absolutely required, and it will
drastically improve our perceived quality in some areas. 

Sound agreeable? 

Cheers... 
Anthony 
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Manager: Eclipse GMF + GEF
IBM Rational Software: Aurora / Modeling Tools 
Phone: 613-591-7037

---

_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev 


-- 
Richard C. Gronback
Borland Software Corporation
richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 860 227 9215_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev