No problem, I’ll add it. I’d just
put HEAD for the tag on new plug-ins when they’re added.
Thanks,
Rich
From:
gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vishwanath Ramaswamy
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005
5:48 PM
To: GMF
Project developer discussions.
Cc: GMF
Project developer discussions.; gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gmf-dev] new
Integration build
Hi Richard,
I
was planning to send you an email on that. We did not add since the map files
were using a specific version tag ( iam assuming the build system tags the
plugins with the latest version #). Can you please add the emf.clipboard.core
test to the build. Thanks for pointing it out.
Cheers
Vishy
Ramaswamy
|
"Richard Gronback"
<Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent
by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
11/07/2005 06:05 PM
|
Please
respond to
"GMF Project developer discussions."
|
|
|
To
|
"GMF Project
developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
RE: [gmf-dev] new Integration build
|
|
Thanks Anthony.
I’ll update the feature.xml to include this plug-in.
In case not everyone realizes it, when adding a test plug-in, the
required tasks are outlined here: http://www.eclipse.org/gmf/development/development_guidelines.html#Testing Of course, this not being a JUnit plug-in means it only
needs to go in the feature.xml and have a map file entry.
I notice another plug-in was added, but is commented out:
o.e.g.tests.runtime.emf.clipboard.core. The tests seem to run OK, but is
not included in the build… Can I add it, Vishy?
Best,
Rich
From:
gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Hunter
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 1:19 PM
To: GMF Project developer discussions.
Subject: Re: [gmf-dev] new Integration build
Hi Richard,
We just added org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.common.ui.services.provider which
is a plug-in used by org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.common.ui to test delayed
plug-in loading when loading service providers (Bug 112797) and handling provider
exceptions (114759).
I updated the tests map file, let me know if it is OK.
Note that org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.common.ui.services.provider is not a
JUnit tests plugin, as indicated by a comment in it's AllTests:
public class AllTests {
/**
* The
org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.common.ui.services.provider tests
* plug-in is not a
JUnit test plug-in. This plug-in is used by
*
org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.common.ui for ProviderPolicyExceptionsTest
* and
ProviderPolicyTest.
*/
}
Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Manager - Software Developer,
IBM Rational Software: Aurora Core Common / Modeling Tools
Phone: 613-591-7037
|
"Richard Gronback"
<Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
11/07/2005 04:07 PM
|
Please
respond to
"GMF Project developer discussions."
<gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
|
To
|
"GMF Project
developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
"GMF Release List"
<gmf-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
[gmf-dev] new Integration build
|
|
Hi All,
I have rebuilt and posted the latest integration build with process affinity
set to just one of the machine’s CPUs to test a theory regarding our test
hangs. It seems to have worked, as all tests passed with no hangups J.
Also, I wanted to test our build procedure for repeated builds using tag
I20051106-0900.
http://download.eclipse.org/technology/gmf/downloads/drops/I-I20051107-200511071200/index.php
Thanks,
Rich
Richard C. Gronback
Borland Software Corporation
richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 860 227 9215
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
