RE: [gmf-dev] M4 Milestone Update Proposal

[Frederic Plante <fplante@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Oops... I was not aware of this, sorry
guys.

Something to consider is that although
the proposed extended iteration does not improve the half-staffed end-of-iteration
situation, it at least gives a true 6w iteration for members of all geographies.

        - Fred

_________________________________
Frédéric Plante
Rational Software, IBM Software Group
770 Palladium Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada 
tel: (613) 591-7034

"Richard Gronback" <Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

10/18/2005 07:31 PM

Please respond to
"GMF Project developer discussions."

To	"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [gmf-dev] M4 Milestone Update Proposal

Hi Fred,
 
Russian holidays occur in early-mid
January, so I’m not sure this makes it any better from the tooling side.
 So, let’s get some feedback from the team… thoughts?
 
Thanks,
Rich

---

From: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Frederic Plante
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 3:21 PM
To: GMF Project developer discussions.
Subject: [gmf-dev] M4 Milestone Update Proposal
 

Hi Rich, 

Because we don't expect many people to be around stabilizing M4 during
the last two weeks of the year, I would like to propose an exception to
our usual Eclipse +2w pattern by moving the milestone date two weeks later.
The proposed M4 would be Jan 13th 2006.

    Thanks

       - Fred

_________________________________
Frédéric Plante
Rational Software, IBM Software Group
770 Palladium Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada 
tel: (613) 591-7034_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev