Re: [gemini-dev] Fwd: Support for Spring 3.2.X and upwards?

[Andrew Scully <andrewscully@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Dmitry, sounds good.

On 20 October 2014 17:16, Dmitry Sklyut <dmitry@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am currently testing with
> http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.servicemix.bundles (search for
> spring in page, i.e.
> http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.servicemix.bundles/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.spring-beans)
>
> Still looking for a better way to keep the current maven coordinates for the
> artifacts.  If there is overriding preference on using current
> org.springframework prefixed artifacts I will provide a set of templates to
> shade artifacts properly.
>
> --
> Dmitry Sklyut
> Sent with Airmail
>
> On October 20, 2014 at 12:10:02 PM, Andrew Scully (andrewscully@xxxxxxxxx)
> wrote:
>
> Forgot to CC.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Andrew Scully <andrewscully@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 20 October 2014 17:08
> Subject: Re: [gemini-dev] Support for Spring 3.2.X and upwards?
> To: Dmitry Sklyut <dmitry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Thanks for the quick reply Dmitry, that's great news!
>
> I'm assuming that you have Spring 4 jars with OSGI metadata included?
> If so, is there a plan to make these publicly available (e.g. on Maven
> central or some other repository) as part of the Gemini Blueprint
> release process?
>
> Cheers, Andy.
>
> On 20 October 2014 17:03, Dmitry Sklyut <dmitry@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am currently in process of upgrading blueprint to spring to 4.1 version.
>> In the next few weeks there should be a working milestone.
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>>
>> Dmitry
>>
>> On October 20, 2014 at 12:01:39 PM, Andrew Scully (andrewscully@xxxxxxxxx)
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was wondering if there's any word on the future of Gemini Blueprint
>> with regards to OSGI-fied Spring bundles?
>>
>> (see http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/gemini-dev/msg01064.html).
>>
>> Obviously, Gemini Blueprint depends heavily on the Spring Framework,
>> but the latest version of Spring you can run with "out of the box" is
>> 3.1.4.RELEASE, as OSGI metadata (in particular the export package
>> statements) are no longer included.
>>
>> Special versions of the jars up to 3.2.5.RELEASE with OSGI headers are
>> available on the Spring Source EBR, but this will soon be
>> dissapearing.
>>
>> So I was wondering if you guys have a definite "line" on this yet?
>>
>> Cheers, Andy.
>> _______________________________________________
>> gemini-dev mailing list
>> gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>> from
>> this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev
> _______________________________________________
> gemini-dev mailing list
> gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
> this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev