Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [gemini-dev] Freezing Gemini Blueprint IP Log
Thanks Otto. Looks good. I don't think you even have to attach source for this kind of CQ.

Regards,
Glyn



On 30 May 2013, at 09:58, "Olaf Otto" <olaf@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Done -  I hope. I have created an umbrella request. Previous versions of both dependencies got approved. The example in [1] refers to artifacts in orbit, but I think this is not required.
 
 
Regards,
Olaf
 
From: gemini-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gemini-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Glyn Normington
Sent: Donnerstag, 30. Mai 2013 10:00
To: Gemini and sub-projects developer discussions
Subject: Re: [gemini-dev] Freezing Gemini Blueprint IP Log
 
As you suggested earlier, I think you should raise one umbrella CQ for the test-only dependencies as per [1].
 
Unfortunately, I think that CQ may take a while to get approved because of the release train effect at this time of year.
 
Anyway, if you could raise it ASAP, we can freeze the IP log as soon as it is approved.
 

<image001.png>
 
On 30 May 2013, at 08:19, "Olaf Otto" <olaf@xxxxxxx> wrote:


Hi Glyn
 
Should I raise CQs for the test-scoped dependencies I added for the refactoring? Other than that, I have nothing particular for the release review.
 
Regards,
Olaf
 
From: gemini-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gemini-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Glyn Normington
Sent: Dienstag, 28. Mai 2013 10:30
To: Gemini and sub-projects developer discussions
Subject: [gemini-dev] Freezing Gemini Blueprint IP Log
 
Hi Olaf
 
I'd like to freeze the IP log and prepare for release soon. Do you intend to raise any CQs or do anything else which should feature in the release review? I doubt that it is necessary to mention test improvements, although they are very much a nice to have.
 
Regards,
Glyn
 

<image001.png>
 
On 9 May 2013, at 13:52, Olaf Otto <olaf@xxxxxxx> wrote:



Hi Glyn

The main reason I'd prefer JaCoCo is that it is completely open source,
hosted on github and published under EPL 1.0
(https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/blob/master/LICENSE.md), thus I believe it
is a better fit for this project.

Regards,
Olaf

-----Original Message-----
From: gemini-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gemini-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of gemini-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Donnerstag, 9. Mai 2013 14:27
To: gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: gemini-dev Digest, Vol 39, Issue 2

Send gemini-dev mailing list submissions to
            gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
            https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
            gemini-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
            gemini-dev-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of gemini-dev digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Gemini Naming 1.0.2.RELEASE is now available (Violeta Georgieva)
  2. Re: gemini-dev Digest, Vol 39, Issue 1 (Olaf Otto)
  3. Re: gemini-dev Digest, Vol 39, Issue 1 (Glyn Normington)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 09:31:10 +0300
From: Violeta Georgieva <milesg78@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Gemini and sub-projects developer discussions
            <gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gemini-dev] Gemini Naming 1.0.2.RELEASE is now available
Message-ID:
            <CAFmzfTUkjTynoHcGS3-F5cGPmBmesJ6GqyCLEfXfT48hLdXGPg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi,

Gemini Naming has shipped its 1.0.2.RELEASE. The artifacts are available for
download [1]. This release contains fix for BZ407399 [2].

The official documentation can be found here [3].

Regards
Violeta

[1] http://eclipse.org/gemini/naming/download.php
[2] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=407399
[3] http://eclipse.org/gemini/naming/documentation.php
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/gemini-dev/attachments/20130509/61f
d27d1/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 13:57:38 +0200
From: "Olaf Otto" <olaf@xxxxxxx>
To: <gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gemini-dev] gemini-dev Digest, Vol 39, Issue 1
Message-ID: <000901ce4cac$6762fef0$3628fcd0$@x100.de>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"

Hi Glyn

I am about half way through all the testcases of the gemini core. I will
make the first commit once I am through with all of them to avoid
inhomogeneous testing state in a branch actively under development. However,
I just committed the POM with the new dependencies - I am quite sure these
shall suffice for the refactorings. Regarding test coverage: I found that an
old version of clover was once used to measure code coverage. It is my
intention to compare both coverage and execution time of the tests with the
initial test coverage figures to prevent a drop of test coverage - how about
switching to JaCoCo (http://www.eclemma.org/jacoco/)? The alternative could
be to request an open source license for clover from Atlassian, but I'd
prefer the former solution.


Regards,
Olaf 

-----Original Message-----
From: gemini-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gemini-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of gemini-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Dienstag, 7. Mai 2013 18:00
To: gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: gemini-dev Digest, Vol 39, Issue 1

Send gemini-dev mailing list submissions to
            gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
            https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
            gemini-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
            gemini-dev-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of gemini-dev digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Re: Gemini Blueprint 2.0.0 schedule (Glyn Normington)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 10:18:16 +0100
From: Glyn Normington <gnormington@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Gemini and sub-projects developer discussions
            <gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gemini-dev] Gemini Blueprint 2.0.0 schedule
Message-ID: <4B7F11F3-5F4A-442E-979B-1A69BB96F2C1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi Olaf

Any progress on this? The end of May isn't as far off as it was...

Regards,
Glyn


On 4 Apr 2013, at 21:41, Olaf Otto <olaf@xxxxxxx> wrote:



Hi all,

First of all, I'd like to say I'm happy to be on board soon. The
gemini-blueprint project is one of the most valuable open source additions
to the projects I'm involved with and I am looking forward to (hopefully)
help advancing it.



Regarding the test improvements: End of May 2013 seems feasible. 
Adding
new dependencies for testing is likely to be the first thing I'll do, thus
getting the CQs done timely should not be an issue. Presumably, those
dependencies are exclusively required for testing (i.e. "works-with" [1]).



I will soon proceed by posting an example of the test conventions and 
code
style I'd like to use to see if everyone agrees.


Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 13:34:10 +0100
From: Glyn Normington <gnormington@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx developer discussions"
            <gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gemini-dev] Gemini Blueprint 2.0.0 schedule
Message-ID: <DB79ABD8-8DCD-4866-B193-E392A404109F@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I'm currently aiming for the end of June for Gemini Blueprint 2.0.0 
([1])
so that it is available to replace 2.0.0.M01 in the Virgo 3.7.0 line which
is also currently planned to ship in June.



Olaf Otto, who should become a GB committer within about a week, is
proposing some improvements to testing which may involve additional
dependencies and therefore CQs. I'd like to understand whether the
improvements can be made by, say, the end of May 2013 so that I can include
them in the 2.0 release. If not, I may go ahead and prepare the 2.0.0
docuware now and we can add the new test stuff in 2.1.0.



Olaf: would you care to comment please?

Regards,
Glyn
[1] http://projects.eclipse.org/projects/rt.gemini.blueprint

-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was 
scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/gemini-dev/attachments/20130
404/02306ba1/attachment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
gemini-dev mailing list
gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev

_______________________________________________
gemini-dev mailing list
gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/gemini-dev/attachments/20130507/60b
4c4a1/attachment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
gemini-dev mailing list
gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev


End of gemini-dev Digest, Vol 39, Issue 1
*****************************************



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 13:25:52 +0100
From: Glyn Normington <gnormington@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Gemini and sub-projects developer discussions
            <gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gemini-dev] gemini-dev Digest, Vol 39, Issue 1
Message-ID: <69D33051-B0DF-4ED5-8FE8-8B3EDD74AACF@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Thanks Olaf.

Why do you prefer JaCoCo? I'm not averse to using it, but I'd like to
understand.

Some background about how Clover could be used on Hudson:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=331221

Regards,
Glyn




On 9 May 2013, at 12:57, Olaf Otto <olaf@xxxxxxx> wrote:



Hi Glyn

I am about half way through all the testcases of the gemini core. I 
will make the first commit once I am through with all of them to avoid 
inhomogeneous testing state in a branch actively under development. 
However, I just committed the POM with the new dependencies - I am 
quite sure these shall suffice for the refactorings. Regarding test 
coverage: I found that an old version of clover was once used to 
measure code coverage. It is my intention to compare both coverage and 
execution time of the tests with the initial test coverage figures to 
prevent a drop of test coverage - how about switching to JaCoCo 
(http://www.eclemma.org/jacoco/)? The alternative could be to request 
an open source license for clover from Atlassian, but I'd prefer the
former solution.



Regards,
Olaf

-----Original Message-----
From: gemini-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:gemini-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of gemini-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Dienstag, 7. Mai 2013 18:00
To: gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: gemini-dev Digest, Vol 39, Issue 1

Send gemini-dev mailing list submissions to
            gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
            https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
            gemini-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
            gemini-dev-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific 
than
"Re: Contents of gemini-dev digest..."


Today's Topics:

 1. Re: Gemini Blueprint 2.0.0 schedule (Glyn Normington)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 10:18:16 +0100
From: Glyn Normington <gnormington@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Gemini and sub-projects developer discussions
            <gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gemini-dev] Gemini Blueprint 2.0.0 schedule
Message-ID: <4B7F11F3-5F4A-442E-979B-1A69BB96F2C1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi Olaf

Any progress on this? The end of May isn't as far off as it was...

Regards,
Glyn


On 4 Apr 2013, at 21:41, Olaf Otto <olaf@xxxxxxx> wrote:



Hi all,

First of all, I'd like to say I'm happy to be on board soon. The
gemini-blueprint project is one of the most valuable open source 
additions to the projects I'm involved with and I am looking forward 
to (hopefully) help advancing it.



Regarding the test improvements: End of May 2013 seems feasible. 
Adding
new dependencies for testing is likely to be the first thing I'll do, 
thus getting the CQs done timely should not be an issue. Presumably, 
those dependencies are exclusively required for testing (i.e. "works-with"
[1]).



I will soon proceed by posting an example of the test conventions and 
code
style I'd like to use to see if everyone agrees.


Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 13:34:10 +0100
From: Glyn Normington <gnormington@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx developer discussions"
            <gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gemini-dev] Gemini Blueprint 2.0.0 schedule
Message-ID: <DB79ABD8-8DCD-4866-B193-E392A404109F@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I'm currently aiming for the end of June for Gemini Blueprint 2.0.0 
([1])
so that it is available to replace 2.0.0.M01 in the Virgo 3.7.0 line 
which is also currently planned to ship in June.



Olaf Otto, who should become a GB committer within about a week, is
proposing some improvements to testing which may involve additional 
dependencies and therefore CQs. I'd like to understand whether the 
improvements can be made by, say, the end of May 2013 so that I can 
include them in the 2.0 release. If not, I may go ahead and prepare 
the 2.0.0 docuware now and we can add the new test stuff in 2.1.0.



Olaf: would you care to comment please?

Regards,
Glyn
[1] http://projects.eclipse.org/projects/rt.gemini.blueprint

-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was 
scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/gemini-dev/attachments/2013
0
404/02306ba1/attachment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
gemini-dev mailing list
gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev

_______________________________________________
gemini-dev mailing list
gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev

-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was 
scrubbed...
URL:
<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/gemini-dev/attachments/201305
07/60b
4c4a1/attachment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
gemini-dev mailing list
gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev


End of gemini-dev Digest, Vol 39, Issue 1
*****************************************

_______________________________________________
gemini-dev mailing list
gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/gemini-dev/attachments/20130509/d4b
2ba80/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pivotal-logo-email-signature.png
Type: image/png
Size: 7498 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/gemini-dev/attachments/20130509/d4b
2ba80/attachment.png>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
gemini-dev mailing list
gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev


End of gemini-dev Digest, Vol 39, Issue 2
*****************************************

_______________________________________________
gemini-dev mailing list
gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev
 
_______________________________________________
gemini-dev mailing list
gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev
 
_______________________________________________
gemini-dev mailing list
gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev

Back to the top