[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: AW: [geclipse-dev] MyProxy packaging
|
Hi
Not 100% correct. The VOMS plugins depends on the glite.info plugin for BDII.
See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=275115 - btw, I'm still
waiting on comments on this one.
Cheers,
Thomas
On Thursday 04 June 2009 12:39:55 Stuempert, Mathias IWR wrote:
> Maybe we should generally remove the VOMS stuff from the gLite plug-ins
> since VOMS is not only gLite?! VOMS does only depend on bouncycastle but
> should not depend on any gLite library if I remember correctly.
>
> Cheers, Mathias
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: geclipse-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx im Auftrag von Ariel Garcia
> Gesendet: Do 04.06.2009 12:19
> An: geclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: [geclipse-dev] MyProxy packaging
>
> Hi Thomas, all,
>
> as you have seen in the previous email the eu.geclipse.myproxy{,.ui}
> plugins are now in the build.
>
> As they depend on e.g.voms i've added them to the glite-feature which is
> IMHO not ideal, because plain Globus would also benefit from it.
>
> On the other hand the plugins are both very small, it doesn't make sense to
> separate them even more in myproxy, myproxy.voms, etc.
>
> My suggestion would be to integrate the MyProxy functionality in the main
> e.g.globus and e.g.voms plugins, where the e.g.globus.myproxy pieces would
> provide an extension point for the e.g.voms.myproxy to register.
>
> What do you think, or do you have a better refactoring proposal?
>
> Cheers, Ariel
>
> _______________________________________________
> geclipse-dev mailing list
> geclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/geclipse-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> geclipse-dev mailing list
> geclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/geclipse-dev
