Re: [geclipse-dev] Re: AW: [geclipse-user] beginner problem (submitting

[Thomas Köckerbauer <tkoeck@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi again

Ok, no need to answer anymore, I think I just found it :)


Cheers,
Thomas



On Tuesday 26 May 2009 14:55:59 Thomas Köckerbauer wrote:
> Hi
>
> > > (Maybe by also allowing MyProxy proxies to be created instead of VOMS
> > > proxies and introducing a check on creation if VOMS extensions are
> > > present? Any ideas from the others?)
> >
> > I don't know anything about the current MyProxy implementation but a
> > check if the VOMS-Extensions are there should be fairly simple, at least
> > as long as we are on the middleware side where we have bouncycastle
> > available for parsing all the X509 stuff ;-) I would have to check the
> > VOMS classes if there is not already (maybe yet a private/internal)
> > method that can be used for such a check. Anyways, at least the
> > functionality for recognizing VOMS extensions is of course definitely
> > present in the VOMS plug-in.
>
> I'm moving this to the dev list since it has mainly to do with the
> implementation of the auth tokens.
>
> I found the code you were talking about and I can use it to find out if the
> proxy from the MyProxy server has VOMS extensions or not. The problem that
> I now have is that I found no way to see which VOs the proxy was created
> for (only having the proxy). But for checking if the proxy is compatible
> (i.e. the auth token description "matches" with the VOMS auth token
> description) I need to have this information (and also the FQANs). Does
> anyone know if this information can somehow be extracted from the proxy?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Thomas
>
> _______________________________________________
> geclipse-dev mailing list
> geclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/geclipse-dev