discussion from bug to Equinox mailing list)
Why? I prefer
to keep discussions in bug reports.
And, it would
not be an Equinox specific question/issue.
Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To:
[equinox-dev] [Bug 531680] [code mining] Avoid cancellation by
(Moved discussion from bug to Equinox
>> As for the other comments, is introducing this as a new default
method on >> IProgressMonitor and coordinating a release with fixes upstream
possible? Or >> will that never allowed? > > Following the rules as they are now that would require a major version > increase. Not something I think is justified to fix this issue.
What are the general plans here? I'd like to see the specific issue fixed
in a good way. Having the new default method on IProgressMonitor seems
like a clean approach. However, I tend to agree that this is a big change
(in terms of impact).
Are there any plans to have another major version? What are the main concerns
in that area?